DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Panda Security Claims Leaked Data was Fake Emails and Non Valid Accounts

Posted on March 8, 2012 by Lee J

Yesterday, Panda Security was hacked, defaced and had a bunch of data leaked by Anonymous hackers flying the LulzSec flag. Tghe attack which is said to of happened due to claims that panda worked with fbi to help bring down certain people that have been involved in recent attacks. Not long after the attack Panda Security announced a short press release on their Facebook page that makes some strong claims that the hackers didn’t get very far and didn’t even deface the main site’s.

Panda Security On March 6th the hacking group LulzSec, part of Anonymous, obtained access to a Panda Security webserver hosted outside of the Panda Security internal network. This server was used only for marketing campaigns and to host some of the company’s blogs. Neither the main website www.pandasecurity.com norwww.cloudantivirus.com were affected in the attack. The attack did not breach Panda Security’s internal network and neither source code, update servers nor customer data was accessed. The only information accessed was related to marketing campaigns such as landing pages and some obsolete credentials, including supposed credentials for employees that have not been working at Panda for over five years. We continue investigating the cause of the intrusion and will provide more details as soon as they become available. Meanwhile we assure all our customers and partners that none of their information has been compromised and that our products and services continue functioning as normal.

As a response to this press release there have been the typical taunts from anonymous supporters that we have seen in the past from the stratfor attacks. Surprisingly they have been fair vocal in the response’s to some questions people are asking with answers like " Hi David, we are pretty sure that the info of our customers or products have not been compromised. The info published about passwords are no longer valid, but not only passwords, but also e-mail addresses are fake. Anyway, and this is not an excuse, nobody is safe. Bigger companies have also suffered from attacks like this. Back in 2010 some other groups tried to attacks Panda as well." So as you can see Panda is claiming the emails were fake and the accounts was no longer active, is this true? its really anyone’s guess unless some one comes forward with further proof. Read panda’s release here


Related:

  • Large medical lab in South Africa suffers multiple data breaches
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals
  • Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Standing in Data Breach Class Actions
  • Is your cyberinsurance paid up? Are you sure?
  • Software dev accidentally leaks Australian govt documents
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Everything’s leaking everywhere: McGill shuts down website that revealed donor records
Anonymous Leak Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2006 in the name of #FreeHammond →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Marquis data breach impacts over 74 US banks, credit unions
  • Virginia Twins Arrested for Conspiring to Destroy Government Databases
  • Cyberattack on Puerto Rico IT vendor Truenorth hits 3 agencies
  • Easy Question, Complicated Answer: What Does It Take to Stop Workers From Snooping?
  • Update on Dos-OP’s report on Nova RaaS
  • KR: Privacy Commissioner’s Office Urges the Public to Beware of Fraudsters Exploiting the Tai Po Fire Disaster
  • Cyber attack on Indian airports? Govt explains the scary threat that disrupted 400 flights last month.
  • How a noisy ransomware intrusion exposed a long-term espionage foothold
  • KR: Hacking scheme targeted 120,000 home cameras for sexual footage
  • GreyNoise launches free scanner to check if you’re part of a botnet

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • EU justice chief draws red line on privacy reforms
  • Kaiser Permanente to Pay Up to $47.5M in Web Tracker Lawsuit
  • How Palantir shifted course to play key role in ICE deportations
  • U.S. Judge Blocks Trump From Cutting Medicaid Funding For Planned Parenthood In 22 States
  • India backs off mandatory ‘cyber safety’ app after surveillance backlash

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.