DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Patient Claims Doctor Used Her in a Book

Posted on March 22, 2012 by Dissent

Robert Kahn reports:

A woman claims in court that a doctor who treated her for drug addiction invaded her privacy by using “her most private, embarrassing, and traumatizing memories in order to surreptitiously obtain material for the book … ‘The Addict: One Patient, One Doctor, One Year.'”

Gabrielle Lisnoff sued Dr. Michael Stein in Federal Court. Stein’s book was published by HarperCollins in 2009.

Read more about the lawsuit on Courthouse News.  The complaint was filed in district court in Rhode Island and alleges violations of  Rhode Island law.  Rhode Island’s online license verification tool shows that a Michael D. Stein is currently licensed as a physician and has had no disciplinary action against him.

If a patient’s case is unusual enough to want to write about or share with others, it’s likely also unusual enough to place the patient is at risk of being identified by those who recognize one or more details of the story – or for the patients to recognize themselves. Even if others do not identify the patient from the writing, I think most patients would be taken aback or distressed if they felt their doctor had exploited their relationship to write a book – even if the author’s intention was to educate (as opposed to commercial gain).

Of course, by suing Dr. Stein, Lisnoff has now essentially outed herself or declared herself as the subject or main patient described in the book, which may have significant and deleterious effects in terms of her future.   Her family and those who the book’s patient describes may also be left wondering whether Lisnoff actually said certain things about them or how much the author adapted what she may have said about them.  Future potential employers may also be curious enough to Google her name and discover that she sued her addiction treatment doctor.

Dr. Stein was not contacted by Courthouse News for a reaction to the lawsuit, which was filed on March 16.  It’s important to note that we do not know whether he will dispute her claim that the book is based on what she told him and readers are reminded once again that a lawsuit is just a complaint with allegations that have not been proven.


Related:

  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Follow-up: Two men who stole bank info from Michaels customers headed to federal prison
Breach Leaves Thousands Of Kaiser Permanente Employees Checking Their Credit Report (update) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (1)
  • Surveillance tech provider Protei was hacked, its data stolen, and its website defaced
  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • Keeping Cool When ICE Arrives: Basic Raid Response Strategies for Laboratories
  • IRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.