DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Ca: Pharmacists lose injunction bid to stop Zellers selling patient info

Posted on April 29, 2012 by Dissent

Well, that was quick. I had no sooner posted an interesting Canadian case involving pharmacy records than the court seemingly ended the matter. The Canadian Press reported:

 A group of Ontario pharmacists has lost its bid for an injunction barring Zellers from selling their patients’ records.

However, a judge says Zellers owns the records and is entitled to sell them.

The judge also says the national retailer has agreed to honour patient-file transfer requests and no harm will flow to the eight pharmacists involved in the claim.

Zellers is closing its 144 pharmacies as part of its sale to U.S.-based Target.

The pharmacists are suing Zellers over sale of their records to Loblaws and Metro Ontario Pharmacies.

They are worried about patient confidentiality being compromised, but the judge says that’s not going to happen.

So I guess we can conclude that the records are not the pharmacists’ records even if they owned the pharmacy franchise in a Zeller store.

I’m not sure what it means that Zeller has agreed to honor patient-file transfer requests.  What happens if the request is made after the sale/transfer to Loblaws and Metro? Will they then destroy their copies of the records? It would be nice to know a bit more about how patient privacy will be protected during this sale.

The court’s  ruling, though, is consistent with what would happen  in the U.S. Under HIPAA, a chain can sell its pharmacy records as part of its assets to another chain and as long as both seller and buyer are covered entities, there would be no problem.  Some of us might wish it wasn’t that way, but it does seem to be what the Privacy Rule permits.

Related posts:

  • Canada: Zellers sued by pharmacists over selling patient records to Loblaws, Metro
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Six charged in skimming ring at Wrigley Field, Chicago restaurants
UK: Axway provides statistics on complaints to the ICO →

3 thoughts on “Ca: Pharmacists lose injunction bid to stop Zellers selling patient info”

  1. Anonymous says:
    April 29, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    This did not surprise me one bit. A health care provider must put the patient first. That means continuity of care must be present and the pharmacists that were trying to stop the sale were not thinking about this crucial matter. If they blocked the sale, then the continuity of care would be violated and would go against the patient’s best interests. It is also part of regulations that pharmacy records must be kept on site for a minimum of 2 years (7 years for CRA because they are also business records). But with electronic patient records being implemented, the minimum of 10 years must be retained and kept.

    In terms of privacy, a Health Provider is an information custodian and as such must ensure the privacy of the patient. Safeguards must be in place to ensure there is no breach in privacy. As long as that is in place, then they have not violated any rules. Circle of care is important to note as it allows communication and sharing of information between health care providers to look after the best interests of the patient. The circle of care includes all health care providers (doctors, nurses, pharmacists, etc) and (including) the patient. As long as it remains within this circle, no breach is made. This prevents any health care provider to disclose information outside to other third parties (including insurance companies).

    1. Anonymous says:
      April 29, 2012 at 1:02 pm

      You raise some wonderful points. Being a cynical New Yorker, I had wondered whether the issue was not continuity of care or privacy at all, but rather who would benefit from the sale of the records – Zeller’s or the franchise owners? Because I never had a chance to read the complaint or any court filings, it wasn’t clear to me what the pharmacists would have done with the records had they prevailed. Do you know?

  2. Anonymous says:
    May 2, 2012 at 10:27 am

    The sale of course will most likely go to Zellers Corporation and not to the pharmacists. As far as I know, the pharmacists do not own the pharmacies they operate. However, they are most likely designated managers (pharmacists who are responsible for overseeing and running all aspects of the pharmacy department). I honestly don’t know what the pharmacists would have done if they succeeded. They obviously did not think things through in regards to the other legal matters that would occur if the sale was stopped. Which is why I think the judge ruled against the injunction.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.