DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Winn-Dixie sued by former employee following third-party data breach

Posted on August 2, 2012 by Dissent

A potential class action lawsuit filed in federal court in Florida made me aware of a data breach that I don’t recall seeing in the media.

Patrick A. Burrows has filed the lawsuit against Purchasing Power, LLC and Winn-Dixie.

According to the complaint, Winn-Dixie shares employee data with Purchasing Power, LLC to administer an employee benefits program. In October 2011, the latter became aware that an employee had stolen employees’ personal information, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and salary information. Some of the employees whose  data were stolen had reportedly had their data sent to Purchasing Power regardless of whether they were enrolled in the program or not. Winn-Dixie allegedly did not inform employees of the breach until January 27, 2012, with no explanation offered as to the delay in notification.

Burrows, a former employee, claims that negligent security and failure to notify timely resulted in the fraudulent filing of a tax return in his name and he suffered harm because he could not obtain his legitimate tax refund.

The complaint alleges negligence, violation of the Stored Communications Act (SCA), violations of Florida’s unfair and deceptive trade practices law, and invasion of privacy.

Winn-Dixie did not respond to a request made yesterday for a response to the lawsuit.

Apparently I’m not the only one to elevate an eyebrow over the SCA  claim.  Cynthia Larose and Kevin McGinty of Mintz Levin comment:

The complaint in Burrows has some evident flaws.  The Stored Communications Act only applies to conduct by entities such as Internet service providers that are engaged in the “provision to the public of computer storage or processing services by means of an electronic communications system.”  18 U.S.C. § 2711(2).  Neither the defendants nor the conduct alleged facially meet this requirement.

Read their full commentary on JD Supra.

 



Related:

  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • KT Chief to Resign After Cybersecurity Breach Resolution
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • A business's cyber insurance policy included ransom coverage, but when they needed it, the insurer refused to pay. Why?
Category: Breach IncidentsBusiness SectorInsiderSubcontractorTheft

Post navigation

← Australian & New Zealand Based Sites Hacked, Data Leaked
SC: Tax Preparer Tosses Sensitive Record in Dumpster →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.