DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Defining Reasonable Security

Posted on August 3, 2012 by Dissent

Tracy Kitten writes:

Last month, an appellate court in Boston reversed a lower court’s ruling that favored a bank in a legal dispute over a 2009 account takeover incident (see PATCO ACH Fraud Ruling Reversed.)

Was that appellate ruling fair? Based on the security practices that most banking institutions used in 2009, probably not. The case exemplifies the challenges courts – and the attorneys arguing both sides – face in resolving cases involving ACH and wire fraud. The key issue? How to define “reasonable” security – and how that definition changes over time.

Read more on BankInfoSecurity.


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← More transparency needed in Health Authority insider breaches
GM notifying more than 800 workers of personal information breach →

1 thought on “Defining Reasonable Security”

  1. IA Eng says:
    August 8, 2012 at 3:07 pm

    A few things stay standard ; The meaning of Due Diligence and Due Care. Its a Q&A solution that works. If withdrawals are out of normal and accepted, since the bank customers are protected by FDIC, it’s the responsibility to have safegaurds in place to notice these things. People trust a banking institution to safguard their property.

    On the other hand, if statements show illegal charges in any situation it is the responsibility of the client to report them immediately to the bank and fill out and certify that charges listed are fraudulent and should be investigated.

    Think BIG business. The effort some – Many – Most businesses of all kinds “accept” a level of profit and are comfortable in achieving that number month over month. If this way of doing business works – why change? Even if they have to kick some funds over to cover identity theft or other issue, they are still above water.

    When the situation changes, or new ways of doing bsuiness are introduced, the banks especially are VERY reluctant to do so. It introduces costs and potential new risks and methods to master, which may take many, many years.

    In all events, to save ones’ Assets its best to ensure Quality Asurance, Information Assurance and Change management is in place in order to run an effective organization. You want Security? it requires some pain and anguish – But that effort will bring strength to the organization and along with that brings Trust. In My opinion, the “Trust” has been severly tainted lately, both on the organizational and citizen levels. Its all about making a quick buck, without watching that trainwreck of risk inbound.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.