DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Identity theft victims can pursue litigation against health insurer: Court

Posted on September 7, 2012 by Dissent

Since December 2009, when two laptops were stolen from AvMed’s office in Gainesville, Florida, the case has been pursued by some of the 1.2 million insured whose personal and health information were on the laptops.  In November 2010, five of them filed a potential class action lawsuit,

Although AvMed claimed in November 2010 that there was no misuse of the information and that one of the laptops had been subsequently recovered, the lawsuit alleges that there was misuse of the information.   Judy Greenwald reports for Crain’s Business Insurance:

Plaintiffs who were allegedly the victims of identity theft because of the theft of two laptops from their health insurer can pursue their litigation against the firm, said a federal appellate court in partially overturning a lower court’s ruling in the putative class action suit that dismissed the case.

According to Wednesday’s ruling by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta in Jean Resnick et al. v. AvMed Inc., in December 2009, two laptop computers containing sensitive information on about 1.2 million current and former AvMed members were stolen from the Gainesville, Fla., office of Miami-based AvMed. This included personal information of Jauna Curry and William Moore, the plaintiffs who were the focus of the ruling.

Ms. Curry’s information was used by an unknown party in October 2010, 10 months after the laptop theft, with Bank of America Corp. accounts opened in her name, as well as credit cards that were activated and used to make unauthorized purchases.

Mr. Moore’s sensitive information was used in February 2011, 14 months after the laptop theft, with an account opened in his name with E-Trade Financial Corp. that was subsequently overdrawn.

[…]

Given the large number of data breaches that occur each year, many of which are never publicly disclosed, I’m not sure how plaintiffs can show that it was this breach that resulted in the fraud on their accounts.  But that should me a matter for the trial court, and I agree with the court’s decision overturning the dismissal if there was some proffer that harm had occurred.
But how did this happen if the consumers had signed up for the free Debix services offered by AvMed after the breach? Had they signed up?  Did they place security freezes on new accounts?
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Update: Alleged EPISD computer hacker expected to plead guilty
Wyndham files motion to dismiss FTC privacy suit →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Dublin ETB fined €125,000 for data protection breaches
  • From $5,000 to $800,000: Days Apart, OCR Security Settlements Show Puzzling Math
  • Liberty Township in Ohio has recovered its network after a ransomware attack
  • Marquette County Medical Care Facility discloses data breach
  • Industry Letter – June 23, 2025: Impact to Financial Sector of Ongoing Global Conflicts
  • MNGI Digestive Health settles class action lawsuit stemming from BlackCat attack
  • Four REvil ransomware members released after time served on carding charges
  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability
  • A militarily degraded Iran may turn to asymmetrical warfare – raising risk of proxy and cyber attacks
  • Pro-Russian hackers disrupt Dutch government websites ahead of NATO summit

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How Internet of Things devices affect your privacy – even when they’re not yours
  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.