DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The City of Tulsa’s costly screw-up

Posted on October 2, 2012 by Dissent

The saga of the City of Tulsa hack-that-wasn’t-a-hack  fascinates me and would be funny if it wasn’t such a costly foul-up. While the city’s IT manager is on paid administrative leave, Ian Silver of Fox23 provides some additional details , most notably:

  • To their credit, the city had hired SecurityMetrics 18 months ago to periodically check their security for holes. The “hack” was a result of SecurityMetrics doing their job and finding a hole in the process.
  • The city checked the IP address for the intruder but thought it might be a spammer. It appears they never checked with SecurityMetrics.  I contacted SecurityMetrics, who provided the following statement:

    SecurityMetrics conducts regular vulnerability scans for tens of thousands of clients each month and uses an identical process to notify all account managers of scan results following each scan completion. In addition, each client has 24/7 online access to their SecurityMetrics account which includes times of past and future scans, and individual scan vulnerabilities. Although there was no breach, we applaud the City of Tulsa for implementing a punctual and accurate response process.

    So it seems the city could have easily checked its account online to see if there had been a scan at the time of the “intrusion,” but didn’t. Had they done that, it could have spared them a lot of time, money, and grief.

  • In addition to paying SecurityMetrics, the city wound up paying $20,000 in mailings to 90,000 people whom they thought had been victims of a hack. They also paid $25,000 to True Digital Security to investigate what they thought was a hack. Why they didn’t ask SecurityMetrics to investigate the hack is not explained. Had they done that, they might have also averted the costly mailing and other fees.
  • The city is hiring yet another firm to help them restructure their IT department so this type of thing doesn’t happen again.

It’s good that they detected a breach, and I don’t want to dismiss the importance of that.  But the rest of this was a bit of a fiasco and re-structuring and improving communications may help avert a similar situation in the future.  But  what are other lessons to be learned here?

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Ca: Student hacks into school board database
NC: Laptops stolen from Robeson elections board contained personal info of 71,000 voters →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ireland’s Data Protection Commission publishes 2024 Annual Report
  • The headlines suggested Freedman Healthcare suffered a ransomware attack that affected patient data. The reality was quite different.
  • Runsafe report: Medical device cyberattacks threaten patient care, strain budgets, top concern for healthcare sector
  • Ryuk ransomware’s initial access expert extradited to the U.S. from Ukraine
  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed (1)
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • US Judge Invalidates Biden Rule Protecting Privacy for Abortions
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.