DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The City of Tulsa’s costly screw-up

Posted on October 2, 2012 by Dissent

The saga of the City of Tulsa hack-that-wasn’t-a-hack  fascinates me and would be funny if it wasn’t such a costly foul-up. While the city’s IT manager is on paid administrative leave, Ian Silver of Fox23 provides some additional details , most notably:

  • To their credit, the city had hired SecurityMetrics 18 months ago to periodically check their security for holes. The “hack” was a result of SecurityMetrics doing their job and finding a hole in the process.
  • The city checked the IP address for the intruder but thought it might be a spammer. It appears they never checked with SecurityMetrics.  I contacted SecurityMetrics, who provided the following statement:

    SecurityMetrics conducts regular vulnerability scans for tens of thousands of clients each month and uses an identical process to notify all account managers of scan results following each scan completion. In addition, each client has 24/7 online access to their SecurityMetrics account which includes times of past and future scans, and individual scan vulnerabilities. Although there was no breach, we applaud the City of Tulsa for implementing a punctual and accurate response process.

    So it seems the city could have easily checked its account online to see if there had been a scan at the time of the “intrusion,” but didn’t. Had they done that, it could have spared them a lot of time, money, and grief.

  • In addition to paying SecurityMetrics, the city wound up paying $20,000 in mailings to 90,000 people whom they thought had been victims of a hack. They also paid $25,000 to True Digital Security to investigate what they thought was a hack. Why they didn’t ask SecurityMetrics to investigate the hack is not explained. Had they done that, they might have also averted the costly mailing and other fees.
  • The city is hiring yet another firm to help them restructure their IT department so this type of thing doesn’t happen again.

It’s good that they detected a breach, and I don’t want to dismiss the importance of that.  But the rest of this was a bit of a fiasco and re-structuring and improving communications may help avert a similar situation in the future.  But  what are other lessons to be learned here?

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Ca: Student hacks into school board database
NC: Laptops stolen from Robeson elections board contained personal info of 71,000 voters →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • ConnectWise suspects cyberattack affecting some ScreenConnect customers was state-sponsored
  • Possible ransomware attack disrupts Maine and New Hampshire Covenant Health locations
  • HHS OCR Settles HIPAA Security Rule Investigation of BayCare Health System for $800k and Corrective Action Plan
  • UK: Two NHS trusts hit by cyberattack that exploited Ivanti flaw
  • Update: ALN Medical Management’s Data Breach Total Soars to More than 1.8 Million Patients Affected
  • Russian-linked hackers target UK Defense Ministry while posing as journalists
  • Banks Want SEC to Rescind Cyberattack Disclosure Requirements
  • MathWorks, Creator of MATLAB, Confirms Ransomware Attack
  • Russian hospital programmer gets 14 years for leaking soldier data to Ukraine
  • MSCS board renews contract with PowerSchool while suing them

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Home Pregnancy Test Company Wins Dismissal of Pixel Wiretapping Suit
  • The CCPA emerges as a new legal battleground for web tracking litigation
  • U.S. Spy Agencies Are Getting a One-Stop Shop to Buy Your Most Sensitive Personal Data
  • Period Tracking App Users Win Class Status in Google, Meta Suit
  • AI: the Italian Supervisory Authority fines Luka, the U.S. company behind chatbot “Replika,” 5 Million €
  • D.C. Federal Court Rules Termination of Democrat PCLOB Members Is Unlawful
  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.