DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Data security flaws part of FTC complaint against Compete

Posted on October 22, 2012 by Dissent

The FTC has been active in going after companies that do not provide adequate data security.  Today, they announced that Compete, Inc. had settled charges involving unfair or deceptive practices associated with collecting and sharing personal information of users.  Of interest here, however, are the charges in the complaint that relate to data security:

Compete’s Data Security Practices

16. In addition to the representations made about the collection of data, Compete made statements about the security of user data such as the following:

We take reasonable security measures to protect against unauthorized access to or unauthorized alteration, disclosure or destruction of personal information. These measures include internal reviews of our data collection, storage and processing practices and security practices.

See General Compete Privacy Policy, Exhibit 5.

17. Respondent engaged in a number of practices that, taken together, failed to provide reasonable and appropriate security for consumer information collected and transmitted by Compete. Among other things, respondent:

a. created unnecessary risks of unauthorized access to consumer information by transmitting sensitive information from secure web pages, such as financial account numbers and security codes, in clear readable text over the Internet;

b. failed to design and implement reasonable information safeguards to control the risks to customer information; and

c. failed to use readily available, low-cost measures to assess and address the risk that the data collection software would collect sensitive consumer information that it was not authorized to collect.

18. These security failures resulted in the creation of unnecessary risk to consumers’ personal information. Compete transmitted the information it gathered – including sensitive information – over the Internet in clear readable text. Tools for capturing data in transit over unsecured wireless networks, such as those often provided in coffee shops and other public spaces, are commonly available, making such clear-text data vulnerable to interception. The misuse of such information, particularly financial account information and Social Security numbers, can facilitate identity theft and related consumer harms.

19. After flaws in Compete’s data collection practices were revealed publicly in January 2010, Compete upgraded its filters, added new algorithms to screen out information such as credit card numbers, and began encrypting data in transit.

The settlement doesn’t require any admission of guilt, but it is encouraging to see the FTC continue to protect consumers from the risk of ID theft by insisting on adequate security.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesOf Note

Post navigation

← ICO: Education ministry BROKE the Data Protection Act
GOP lawmakers slam HHS over identity-theft risk in Medicare →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Dutch Government: More forms of espionage to be a criminal offence from 15 May onwards
  • B.C. health authority faces class-action lawsuit over 2009 data breach (1)
  • Private Industry Notification: Silent Ransom Group Targeting Law Firms
  • Data Breach Lawsuits Against Chord Specialty Dental Partners Consolidated
  • PA: York County alerts residents of potential data breach
  • FTC Finalizes Order with GoDaddy over Data Security Failures
  • Hacker steals $223 million in Cetus Protocol cryptocurrency heist
  • Operation ENDGAME strikes again: the ransomware kill chain broken at its source
  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • AI: the Italian Supervisory Authority fines Luka, the U.S. company behind chatbot “Replika,” 5 Million €
  • D.C. Federal Court Rules Termination of Democrat PCLOB Members Is Unlawful
  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says
  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.