DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

WA: Prescription drug tracking system illegally accessed (updated)

Posted on October 28, 2012 by Dissent

From the this-can’t-be-good dept.:

This week Washington’s Prescription Monitoring Program sent letters to 34 people whose records were illegally accessed by someone who used a physician’s identity.

The doctor’s personal and professional information was used to set up a fraudulent account in the statewide system.

[…]

State health officials immediately deactivated the account when they learned it was fraudulent. The illegal account had been used to put the information of 34 patients into a format that can be downloaded. The patients and their prescribing providers have been notified and law enforcement is now investigating the case.

Read more on Enumclaw Courier-Herald.

Exactly what personal information is in that database? Anyone know?

Update:  Okay, I looked up Washington’s law on this. Here’s the relevant section that gives us a clue as to what data types are in each record:

 (2) Except as provided in subsection (4) of this section, each dispenser shall submit to the department by electronic means information regarding each prescription dispensed for a drug included under subsection (1) of this section. Drug prescriptions for more than one day use should be reported. The information submitted for each prescription shall include, but not be limited to:

(a) Patient identifier;

(b) Drug dispensed;

(c) Date of dispensing;

(d) Quantity dispensed;

(e) Prescriber; and

(f) Dispenser.

(3) Each dispenser shall submit the information in accordance with transmission methods established by the department.

(4) The data submission requirements of subsections (1) through (3) of this section do not apply to:

(a) Medications provided to patients receiving inpatient services provided at hospitals licensed under chapter 70.41 RCW; or patients of such hospitals receiving services at the clinics, day surgery areas, or other settings within the hospital’s license where the medications are administered in single doses;

(b) Pharmacies operated by the department of corrections for the purpose of providing medications to offenders in department of corrections institutions who are receiving pharmaceutical services from a department of corrections pharmacy, except that the department of corrections must submit data related to each offender’s current prescriptions for controlled substances upon the offender’s release from a department of corrections institution; or

(c) Veterinarians licensed under chapter 18.92 RCW. The department, in collaboration with the veterinary board of governors, shall establish alternative data reporting requirements for veterinarians that allow veterinarians to report:

(i) By either electronic or nonelectronic methods;

(ii) Only those data elements that are relevant to veterinary practices and necessary to accomplish the public protection goals of this chapter; and

(iii) No more frequently than once every three months and no less frequently than once every six months.

What I haven’t found yet is the definition of “patient identifier,” so I’ve sent an e-mail to the state requesting clarification and will update this entry if/when I get an answer.

Update:  I sent an inquiry to the state, who kindly responded with the following details:

(i) Patient identifier. A patient identifier is the unique
identifier assigned to a particular patient by the dispenser;

(ii) Name of the patient for whom the prescription is ordered
including first name, middle initial, last name, and generational
suffixes, if any;

(iii) Patient date of birth;

(iv) Patient address;

(v) Patient gender;

(vi) Drug dispensed;

(vii) Date of dispensing;

(viii) Quantity and days supply dispensed;

(ix) Refill information;

(x) Prescriber identifier;

(xi) Prescription issued date;

(xii) Dispenser identifier;

(xiii) Prescription fill date and number;

(xiv) Source of payment indicated by one of the following:

(A) Private pay (cash, change, credit card, check);

(B) Medicaid;

(C) Medicare;

(D) Commercial insurance;

(E) Military installations and veterans affairs;

(F) Workers compensation;

(G) Indian nations;

(H) Other; and

(xv) When practicable, the name of person picking up or dropping
off the prescription, as verified by valid photographic identification.

They provide whatever unique identifier they assign to a patient. It does not need to be the same for every pharmacy. The only requirement is that they can use the identifier to trace back to a certain patient.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Tax refund fraud linked to health care documents
NZ: Inland Revenue Department has had 32 privacy breaches in the past year. →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Alleged Geisinger hacker will defend himself pro se.
  • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare reveals it was also impacted by Cerner/Legacy Oracle cyberattack
  • Hospital cyberattack investigation complete, no formal review needed
  • Largest Ever Seizure of Funds Related to Crypto Confidence Scams
  • IMPACT: 170 patients harmed as a result of Qilin’s ransomware attack on NHS vendor Synnovis
  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • UBS reports data leak after cyber attack on provider, client data unaffected
  • Scania confirms insurance claim data breach in extortion attempt
  • Cybersecurity takes a big hit in new Trump executive order
  • Episource notifying 5.4 million patients of cyberattack in January

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • DOJ’s Data Security Program: Key Compliance Considerations for Impacted Entities
  • 23andMe fined £2.31 million for failing to protect UK users’ genetic data
  • DOJ Seeks More Time on Tower Dumps
  • Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer
  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.