DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

EU ministers to consider ‘two-strikes’ rule for data breaches

Posted on January 16, 2013 by Dissent

Jennifer Baker reports:

European Union justice ministers will consider a “two-strikes” rule for data breaches.

The Irish Presidency of the European Council published a paper on the protection of citizens’ personal data that will be discussed at Justice and Home Affairs Council in Dublin on January 17 and 18.

The paper asks European justice ministers to consider whether sanctions, such as fines, “should be optional or at least conditional upon a prior warning or reprimand.”

Read more on ComputerworldUK.


Related:

  • Snowflake Loses Two More Bids to Dismiss Data Breach Plaintiffs
  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
Category: Breach LawsU.S.

Post navigation

← Zaxby’s customers need more information
6,000 patients to be notified after UDOH contractor loses drive with unencrypted PHI →

2 thoughts on “EU ministers to consider ‘two-strikes’ rule for data breaches”

  1. IA Eng says:
    January 18, 2013 at 9:45 am

    This makes NO sense. I read this and immediately thought – Oh, Its OK to get breached the first time and have the potential not to get fined.

    Isn’t that sending the WRONG message? It means that companies that consider security and compliance to regulations may be a bit lax on that isue, gambling that the revenue pile can be higher if less is spent on security controls. Then if they are fined, they have at least 2 strikes before they have to do anything about it. Thats the way a shady company would read it.

    Yeah it says optional. I don’t see any government doing an optional plan.

    Fines should be a mandatory thing based upon research that is related to an out of pocket cost for an individual to pay for Identity coverage and other services related to a very similar breach.

    Giving organizations a way out only muddies the water and will make it even harder to have these places get to a set standard.

    This is a real bad idea.

    1. admin says:
      January 18, 2013 at 11:07 am

      You realize that our FTC also doesn’t fine on a first offense and can only fine for a second or repeat offender, right?

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.