DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

New York woman's intimate personal details made public in New Mexico abortion clinic probe

Posted on February 7, 2013 by Dissent

Associated Press reports:

A woman from New York came to New Mexico to terminate her pregnancy at one of the nation’s four late-term abortion clinics after she found out the fetus she had been carrying for more than eight months had severe brain abnormalities. There were complications during the abortion and the 26-year-old woman was rushed to the hospital with a ruptured uterus.

Nearly two years later, the intimate details of her medical treatment, her mental state, her religion and family status have become public as part of a state medical board probe that was initiated not by the patient, but by anti-abortion activists with Operation Rescue who aggressively monitor and file complaints based on 911 calls made from abortion clinics.

Read more on New York Daily News.

Is this what happens because 911 calls are often accessible under open records law? I’ve discussed that issue before on this blog, but this case is a horrifying example of the failure to protect medical privacy. Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the woman’s choice, would you want your medical treatment, mental state, religion and family status made public because someone can get your 911 call.

I wish Congress would enact legislation to protect the medical confidentiality of 911 calls. There does need to be some press exemption so that the media can evaluate response times, issues of racism, etc., in evaluating and reporting on EMS services, but even records that are subject to FOI should be redacted to protect the identity of the caller in almost all cases.

Note that in this case, the real exposure of the patient’s information came out in the medical board review of a complaint filed by anti-abortionists. That, too, needs more protection. As someone who has been involved in a medical board review of a physician’s conduct, I know that patients were afraid to testify for fear that their details would become public. We need more protection there, too.

Additional details on the case and an update that the doctor was exonerated can be found on Fox11.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← SCDOR breach: Judge dismisses Governor and former DOR director as defendants
Maybe if we shout? →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters
  • Dutch police identify users on Cracked.io
  • Help, please: Seeking copies of the PowerSchool ransom email(s)
  • RCMP thumb drive with informant, witness data obtained by criminals: watchdog

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Meta AI app is a privacy disaster – TechCrunch
  • Apple fixes new iPhone zero-day bug used in Paragon spyware hacks
  • Norwegian Data Protection Authority’s findings on tracking pixels: 6 cases
  • Multiple States Enact Genetic Privacy Legislation in a Busy Start to 2025
  • Rules Proposed Under New Jersey Data Privacy Act
  • Using facial recognition? Three recent articles of interest.
  • India publishes consent management rules under Digital Personal Data Protection Act

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.