DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Patient Steals Other Patients’ Info

Posted on March 7, 2013 by Dissent

Paul Smith reports on an incident at a Lancaster, Pennsylvania medical practice:

A patient at Crooked Oak Family Medicine stole a document containing personal information about some of the practice’s other patients on February 5, 2013.

Read more on Fox43.

A statement posted today on Lancaster General Health‘s web site says:

A Crooked Oak Family Medicine patient stole a document containing personal information about some of the practice’s patients on Feb. 5, 2013.

The patient was at Crooked Oak, Lancaster, for an appointment and while there, became agitated and disruptive. To calm the patient, he was taken to the office of the practice manager. While meeting with the practice manager, the patient grabbed a stack of papers from the manager’s desk. He then ran out of the building before practice personnel could stop him. LG Health Security notified Manheim Township Police and several attempts were made to retrieve the document with patient information from the patient. Unfortunately, the patient did not return the document.

The document stolen included patient names, genders and dates of birth, whether they had received certain cancer screenings such as a mammogram, colonoscopy, etc., whether a pediatric well child-care visit had been conducted and whether they received the pneumococcal vaccination. The document contained no Social Security numbers, no addresses and no credit card information.

There is no evidence that patient information has been misused. Lancaster General Medical Group (LGMG) and its Crooked Oak practice are reviewing its office policies and procedures to prevent a similar incident in the future.

LGMG is offering 12 months of free, identity theft protection services to any Crooked Oak Family Medicine patient whose information was included in the stolen document. The services include credit monitoring, access to fraud resolution representatives, and more.

Patient questions regarding this incident can be directed to ID Experts at 1-866-833-7924.

This release is in accordance with the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act. Lancaster General Medical Group has notified its affected patients and the Department of Health and Human Services.

It’s not clear why the patient grabbed documents and why he reportedly wouldn’t return a document with other patients’ information. Was it no longer in his possession or did he just refuse to return it, and if so, did the practice seek a court order? And why did he grab the information?  There’s no doubt in my mind that this is a reportable breach under HITECH, but it would be nice to know his motivation in taking the files and his reasons for refusing to return them.

No related posts.

Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Law firms gear up for class-action against Montfort over personal data loss
HIPAA and state law privacy claims stand while medical malpractice claim falls →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records
  • Qilin claims attack on Accu Reference Medical Laboratory. It wasn’t the lab’s first data breach.
  • Louis Vuitton hit by data breach in Türkiye, over 140,000 users exposed; UK customers also affected (1)
  • Infosys McCamish Systems Enters Consent Order with Vermont DFR Over Cyber Incident
  • Obligations under Canada’s data breach notification law

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.