DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Westpac tight-lipped over privacy breach

Posted on April 2, 2013 by Dissent

Jimmy Ellingham reports:

Westpac is refusing to say if it has told customers affected by a privacy breach that details of their term deposits have been either handed over or taken from one of its Palmerston North branches.

Regardless of how the breach happened, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner says it is often a good idea for organisations to notify affected parties.

On March 1 Tane Rogers left the bank’s Broadway Ave branch with three pieces of paper listing 25 customers’ term deposit account numbers, start dates, maturity dates, interest rates and balances.

Mr Rogers says he was given the papers as part of a sheaf of information handed over by a bank employee.

But the bank has called in police and is understood to have accused Mr Rogers of taking the papers – an accusation he denies.

The Manawatu Standard has asked Westpac if it notified the 25 people whose details were on the papers.

Spokesman Chris Mirams said: “Thanks for your inquiry, we’ve got nothing to add.”

Read more on Manawatu Standard.

Anyone care to ask me again why we need mandatory breach notification laws everywhere?

Category: Breach IncidentsFinancial SectorNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Anonymous claim to leak data from propaganda site Uriminzokkiri.com for #OpNorthKorea
Advocacy Group Issues Recommendations on Using Surveillance Data for HIV Care Linkage and Retention →

1 thought on “Westpac tight-lipped over privacy breach”

  1. IA ENG says:
    April 3, 2013 at 8:01 am

    The bank employee sounds like they have a lot of integrity – don’t they? HA !

    I bet you this is what happened. The employee printed something for the customer. walks over to the printer and grabs ALL the papers of the printer and hands them over to the customer. Maybe another bank employee asks if they took his papers off the printer. The employee that handed over the papers goes DOH !!! and then crap hits the fan.

    Printers too can have confidential material on them. It is NOT good practice to use one printer for both bank confidential information and to print customer paperwork. It costs a mere 1,000 to have these separated, just like the jobs are.

    A simple practice of looking over the papers before handing them over would have prevented this. If this wasn’t the sceanrio, then confidential paperwork laying about in the open is NOT good practice either. A clean desk where customers and cleaning crews roam is paramount for any business.

    I assume…which may be a BAD thing for this scenario is that they have cameras in places where potential customers can wander. Cameras may be able to show whether an employee went DOH!!! and handed the customer the papers, or the customer simply grabs 3 pieces of paper off a desk.

    I can see this getting out of hand. If the customer is right and has been unlawfully accused, I wonder if he will lawyer up and take some of the banks’ profits.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach
  • Cyberattack brings down Kettering Health phone lines, MyChart patient portal access (1)
  • Gujarat ATS arrests 18-year-old for cyberattacks during Operation Sindoor
  • Hackers Nab 15 Years of UK Legal Aid Applicant Data
  • Supplier to major UK supermarkets Aldi, Tesco & Sainsbury’s hit by cyber attack with ransom demand
  • UK: Post Office to compensate hundreds of data leak victims
  • How the Signal Knockoff App TeleMessage Got Hacked in 20 Minutes
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy
  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.