DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

The “we’re just one of many” excuse doesn’t fly here

Posted on April 8, 2013 by Dissent

With all the news about #OpIsrael, it was easy to miss a breach that was reported today involving Kirkwood Community College in Iowa.

On March 13, they were hacked, and the hacker had access to 125,000 records from students who had applied online for credit courses between February 2005 and March 5, 2013. The school is not sure whether any data were downloaded at the time of this publication.

In WCF Couriers’ coverage of the breach, vice president of student services Kristie Fisher was quoted:

She said the college believes that its database was adequately protected, but that hacking has become too common.

How can you claim your database was adequately protected when it was just hacked to the tune of 125,000 records?

“Unfortunately, we think we just found ourselves in the middle of something that’s happening all over the world,” she said. “In today’s world, you can’t protect anything 100 percent when it’s online.”

OK, so then knowing that, why did you need to have records going back to February 2005 connected online? Are students who signed up in February 2005 at your two-year community college still signing up for classes 8 years later?

Knowing the risk, did you really need all that data connected?

Category: Breach IncidentsEducation SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← NZ: EQC takes out injunction over privacy breach
Midwest BankCentre Hacked and Data leaked →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Massachusetts hacker to plead guilty to PowerSchool data breach
  • Cyberattack brings down Kettering Health phone lines, MyChart patient portal access (1)
  • Gujarat ATS arrests 18-year-old for cyberattacks during Operation Sindoor
  • Hackers Nab 15 Years of UK Legal Aid Applicant Data
  • Supplier to major UK supermarkets Aldi, Tesco & Sainsbury’s hit by cyber attack with ransom demand
  • UK: Post Office to compensate hundreds of data leak victims
  • How the Signal Knockoff App TeleMessage Got Hacked in 20 Minutes
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Ex-NSA bad-guy hunter listened to Scattered Spider’s fake help-desk calls: ‘Those guys are good’
  • Former Sussex Police officer facing trial for rape charged with 18 further offences relating to computer misuse

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach
  • Drugmaker Regeneron to acquire 23andMe out of bankruptcy
  • Massachusetts Senate Committee Approves Robust Comprehensive Privacy Law
  • Montana Becomes First State to Close the Law Enforcement Data Broker Loophole
  • Privacy enforcement under Andrew Ferguson’s FTC

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.