DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Notice to Indiana University Health Arnett patients regarding missing laptop

Posted on May 10, 2013 by Dissent

Indiana University Health Arnett, Inc. (“Arnett”) is committed to maintaining the privacy and security of the personal information provided to us. Regrettably, this notice concerns some of that information.

On April 10, 2013, we learned that an employee’s password-protected unencrypted laptop was stolen from the employee’s car the day before.  The White County Sheriff’s Office was immediately contacted and we began an internal investigation. That investigation determined that the laptop contained patient information. Emails stored on the laptop’s hard drive may have contained patient names, dates of birth, physicians’ names, medical record numbers, diagnoses and dates of service. The laptop did not contain Social Security numbers, financial information, or patients’ medical records.

While Arnett has no reason to believe the information on this laptop has been improperly accessed or used, we believe as a precaution it was important to tell our patients this happened.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you. Arnett takes very seriously its obligation to keep the information it maintains secure and we appreciate the trust that you place in us. Arnett is reviewing its policies and procedures to minimize the chance of such an incident occurring in the future. In addition, Arnett has mandatory privacy and security training for all of its workforce members.

We value our patients, and began mailing letters to the affected patients on May 10, 2013. If you believe you are affected but do not receive a letter by May 31, 2013, or if you have any questions regarding this incident, please call 1.888.722.0627 Monday through Friday between 9 am and 7 pm Eastern Time and enter or say the following telephone pass code 2121447 when prompted.

SOURCE:  Indiana University Health

So they have “no reason to believe the information has been accessed?” Do they have any reason to believe it hasn’t been? Was the laptop installed with any protections that would have notified them?  And was the employee violating policy by (1) not having encryption deployed and (2) leaving the laptop in a car?  Was this an IUHA-issued laptop or the employee’s personal laptop that was used to access work-related emails?

JCONline adds a statement from Arnett as to the delay in notification:

The original release from IU Health Arnett did not explain why the theft was not made public until May 10. When asked that question, Fuqua issued the following statement:

“Arnett is committed to maintaining the privacy and security of the patient information provided to us, and we worked hard to notify our patients as soon as possible. As soon as we learned of the theft on April 10, we immediately began a thorough internal investigation to determine which of our patients were affected and what information was included.”

 

In other words, they didn’t really explain why it took one month to notify.

Related posts:

  • IU Health Arnett Hospital notified 30,000 of missing or stolen portable storage device
  • July theft of computer with Fairview patient data wasn't the first, Minnesota AG says
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Patients sue Montfort Hospital in Ottawa for $40 million following breach
Regional Medical Center in Memphis notifies 1,200 physical therapy patients after e-mail attachment error →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Terrible tales of opsec oversights: How cybercrooks get themselves caught
  • International Criminal Court hit with cyber attack during NATO summit
  • Pembroke Regional Hospital reported canceling appointments due to service delays from “an incident”
  • Iran-linked hackers threaten to release emails allegedly stolen from Trump associates
  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.