DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Pentagon blocks workers’ Web access after security breach

Posted on June 9, 2013 by Dissent

Kristina Wong reports:

News and social media websites have been blocked on some Pentagon workstations Friday to prevent employees and contractors from accessing classified information that was leaked Thursday about a federal program that gathers Internet users’ personal data from the computer servers of Web service providers.

U.S. Cyber Command recommended the blocking, which began about 11:30 a.m. Friday, a Defense Department source said.

Read more on Washington Times.

So once again, everyone else can read what our own government leaked, but government employees can’t.  This is not the first time we’ve seen this approach to containing a leak of classified information – we saw this after WikiLeaks started publishing State Department cables leaked by Bradley Manning – but it still seems like futility personified.

No related posts.

Category: Government Sector

Post navigation

← TX: At least one Arlington school district employee has reported unauthorized financial activity after laptop theft
Hetzner Security Breach Exposes Customer Passwords, Payment Information →

1 thought on “Pentagon blocks workers’ Web access after security breach”

  1. IA Eng says:
    June 10, 2013 at 8:41 am

    The blocking of the web sites is to control the bleeding. Even if the information – of any type is viewed, it becomes a problem cleaning off potentially sensitive data off machines that should remain clean.

    There are other reasons, but I will state generic items of interest.

    One of the pitfalls is the hacker community quickly will take breaking news and stand up sites that look like the stereotypical webite in question. Should a user click on the wrong link, Incident Response is off to the races to plug another potential issue.

    Its also a distractor; work may get sidelined, gossip at the water cooler increases, curiosity gets the better of most people without thinking of the ramifications.

    Government employees, military and contractors are expected to operate at a slightly higher standard and protect the assets of the US government. The typical party line on most US government assets are that people will not use government assets for personal property, or personal gain. In a typical user agreement, they autograph a paper that states that their activity could be monitored, and they shall follow all policies and not circumvent any security controls.

    In my opinion, the intent of keeping people using government assets from viewing potentially classified or sensitive data just keeps the network clean of potential unwanted information, saving many, many, many hours of work and needless investigations.

    With less to clean up, the “real” investigation gets underway and then, what needs to be uncovered, who knew about it, who ignored the warning signs, can then be filtered out.

    Its a long story, but the ability to control what potentially could be as a lot more work for the Information Assurance and Computer Network Defense teams can be avoided by blocking sites with good intentions in mind.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked
  • Breaches have consequences (sometimes) (1)
  • Kansas City Man Pleads Guilty for Hacking a Non-Profit
  • British national “IntelBroker” charged with causing $25 million in damages; U.S. seeks his extradition from France
  • France issues press statement about arrest of ShinyHunters members
  • Patients Allege Home Delivery Pharmacy Failed to Timely Notify Them of Data Breach
  • Hackers breach Norwegian dam, open valve at full capacity

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions
  • NY Attorney General James Affirms Hospitals Must Provide Access to Emergency Abortion Care
  • How Internet of Things devices affect your privacy – even when they’re not yours
  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.