DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Pentagon blocks workers’ Web access after security breach

Posted on June 9, 2013 by Dissent

Kristina Wong reports:

News and social media websites have been blocked on some Pentagon workstations Friday to prevent employees and contractors from accessing classified information that was leaked Thursday about a federal program that gathers Internet users’ personal data from the computer servers of Web service providers.

U.S. Cyber Command recommended the blocking, which began about 11:30 a.m. Friday, a Defense Department source said.

Read more on Washington Times.

So once again, everyone else can read what our own government leaked, but government employees can’t.  This is not the first time we’ve seen this approach to containing a leak of classified information – we saw this after WikiLeaks started publishing State Department cables leaked by Bradley Manning – but it still seems like futility personified.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • Data breach in 42 Latvian municipalities: DVI imposes 300,000 euro fine on ZZ Dats
  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Romanian prisoner hacks prison IT system in plot made for a Netflix movie
  • John Bolton Indictment Provides Interesting Details About Hack of His AOL Account and Extortion Attempt
Category: Government Sector

Post navigation

← TX: At least one Arlington school district employee has reported unauthorized financial activity after laptop theft
Hetzner Security Breach Exposes Customer Passwords, Payment Information →

1 thought on “Pentagon blocks workers’ Web access after security breach”

  1. IA Eng says:
    June 10, 2013 at 8:41 am

    The blocking of the web sites is to control the bleeding. Even if the information – of any type is viewed, it becomes a problem cleaning off potentially sensitive data off machines that should remain clean.

    There are other reasons, but I will state generic items of interest.

    One of the pitfalls is the hacker community quickly will take breaking news and stand up sites that look like the stereotypical webite in question. Should a user click on the wrong link, Incident Response is off to the races to plug another potential issue.

    Its also a distractor; work may get sidelined, gossip at the water cooler increases, curiosity gets the better of most people without thinking of the ramifications.

    Government employees, military and contractors are expected to operate at a slightly higher standard and protect the assets of the US government. The typical party line on most US government assets are that people will not use government assets for personal property, or personal gain. In a typical user agreement, they autograph a paper that states that their activity could be monitored, and they shall follow all policies and not circumvent any security controls.

    In my opinion, the intent of keeping people using government assets from viewing potentially classified or sensitive data just keeps the network clean of potential unwanted information, saving many, many, many hours of work and needless investigations.

    With less to clean up, the “real” investigation gets underway and then, what needs to be uncovered, who knew about it, who ignored the warning signs, can then be filtered out.

    Its a long story, but the ability to control what potentially could be as a lot more work for the Information Assurance and Computer Network Defense teams can be avoided by blocking sites with good intentions in mind.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Report released on PowerSchool cyber attack
  • Sue The Hackers – Google Sues Over Phishing as a Service
  • Princeton University Data Breach Impacts Alumni, Students, Employees
  • Eurofiber admits crooks swiped data from French unit after cyberattack
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • French agency Pajemploi reports data breach affecting 1.2M people
  • From bad to worse: Doctor Alliance hacked again by same threat actor (1)
  • Surveillance tech provider Protei was hacked, its data stolen, and its website defaced
  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • CIPL Publishes Discussion Paper Comparing U.S. State Privacy Law Definitions of Personal Data and Sensitive Data
  • India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 brought into force
  • Five major changes to the regulation of cybersecurity in the UK under the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill
  • Keeping Cool When ICE Arrives: Basic Raid Response Strategies for Laboratories
  • IRS Accessed Massive Database of Americans Flights Without a Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.