DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Pentagon blocks workers’ Web access after security breach

Posted on June 9, 2013 by Dissent

Kristina Wong reports:

News and social media websites have been blocked on some Pentagon workstations Friday to prevent employees and contractors from accessing classified information that was leaked Thursday about a federal program that gathers Internet users’ personal data from the computer servers of Web service providers.

U.S. Cyber Command recommended the blocking, which began about 11:30 a.m. Friday, a Defense Department source said.

Read more on Washington Times.

So once again, everyone else can read what our own government leaked, but government employees can’t.  This is not the first time we’ve seen this approach to containing a leak of classified information – we saw this after WikiLeaks started publishing State Department cables leaked by Bradley Manning – but it still seems like futility personified.

Category: Government Sector

Post navigation

← TX: At least one Arlington school district employee has reported unauthorized financial activity after laptop theft
Hetzner Security Breach Exposes Customer Passwords, Payment Information →

1 thought on “Pentagon blocks workers’ Web access after security breach”

  1. IA Eng says:
    June 10, 2013 at 8:41 am

    The blocking of the web sites is to control the bleeding. Even if the information – of any type is viewed, it becomes a problem cleaning off potentially sensitive data off machines that should remain clean.

    There are other reasons, but I will state generic items of interest.

    One of the pitfalls is the hacker community quickly will take breaking news and stand up sites that look like the stereotypical webite in question. Should a user click on the wrong link, Incident Response is off to the races to plug another potential issue.

    Its also a distractor; work may get sidelined, gossip at the water cooler increases, curiosity gets the better of most people without thinking of the ramifications.

    Government employees, military and contractors are expected to operate at a slightly higher standard and protect the assets of the US government. The typical party line on most US government assets are that people will not use government assets for personal property, or personal gain. In a typical user agreement, they autograph a paper that states that their activity could be monitored, and they shall follow all policies and not circumvent any security controls.

    In my opinion, the intent of keeping people using government assets from viewing potentially classified or sensitive data just keeps the network clean of potential unwanted information, saving many, many, many hours of work and needless investigations.

    With less to clean up, the “real” investigation gets underway and then, what needs to be uncovered, who knew about it, who ignored the warning signs, can then be filtered out.

    Its a long story, but the ability to control what potentially could be as a lot more work for the Information Assurance and Computer Network Defense teams can be avoided by blocking sites with good intentions in mind.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors
  • Two Men Sentenced to Prison for Aggravated Identity Theft and Computer Hacking Crimes
  • 100,000 UK taxpayer accounts hit in £47m phishing attack on HMRC

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant
  • US State Dept. says silence or anonymity on social media is suspicious

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.