DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Luton Borough Council signs undertaking after data protection failures

Posted on September 11, 2013 by Dissent

An undertaking has been signed by Luton Borough Council following two incidents involving inappropriate handling of sensitive personal data. These incidents occurred after the council failed to implement recommendations made by the ICO for mandatory employee training following earlier incidents.

The two more recent  incidents involved sensitive personal data that was incorrectly handled by social work staff. One incident took place in December 2012 and the other in January 2013.

In one incident, an email containing personal data about one family, together with advice to one individual, was sent unprotected across an internet connection and also misdirected to an agency dealing with a different family. In the other case, a social worker was advised to leave the office and return home due to severe weather and took with them the paperwork they’d worked on that day. Some of it, containing personal data about a vulnerable young person, was lost as the result of an accident on the journey home.

View a PDF of Luton Borough Council’s undertaking, which outlines the training requirements for employees and the requirement for refreshing training not less than once every two years.  The council should probably consider itself fortunate that it didn’t incur a monetary penalty as they had already been advised of shortcomings and the need for training but didn’t follow through.

 

 

Category: ExposureGovernment SectorLost or MissingNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Trade Secret Theft Case Nets 5-Year Prison Term for North Texas Exec
HHS Readies HIPAA Rule to Keep Mentally Ill from Buying Guns →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.