DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

MI: Tax preparer leaves clients’ tax records behind in foreclosed home, but so did Treasury agents sent in to clean it out

Posted on November 13, 2013 by Dissent

Okay, this is bad.

Ken Kolker reports:

Federal agents raided a tax preparer’s former home and seized abandoned documents from decades of returns, including names, addresses and Social Security numbers — but they didn’t get it all, Target 8 discovered on Wednesday.

Target 8 found thousands of pages of tax documents in a burn barrel behind the empty home. Unburned, they showed enough information for thieves to easily steal taxpayers’ identities.

Other records were scattered on the ground, including a W2 from a man from the City of Wyoming; tax documents that showed another man earned $90,400; a pay stub for a man named Daniel.

Federal officials told Target 8 they planned to return to the home to seize the left-behind documents.

It started about three weeks ago when long-time tax preparer Karol Fitzgerald lost her home to foreclosure and moved out. She ran her tax business from the home. She left behind records from several decades as a tax preparer.

[…]

Fitzgerald, 69, said she didn’t know the feds had raided her former home. She said she thought her son had burned the tax records in burn barrels out back.

Read more on Wood8. For what it’s worth, I wouldn’t describe this as a “raid” as much as the IRS responsibly coming in to clean up the mess the tax preparer left behind. Yes, it was appropriate to get a warrant as it was not their property and they’re the government, but “raid” connotes something else to me. Sadly, they do not seem to have done a totally thorough job in reclaiming/securing the records, as some were still left behind until the news station investigated and contacted them.

Under Michigan law, do all the clients have to be notified if the records were n paper format? I think Michigan law should cover paper format, although the statute does refer to data being part of a “database.” And if notification is required for paper records, who’s going to notify all those clients that their records were exposed? Ms. Fitzgerald no longer has the records. So would/will the feds provide notification to individuals?

And do we know if any – or how many – records may have been stolen while the home was left unsecured?

What a mess.

I seem to recall another case in Michigan where the state sued someone for abandoning and burning records, but I’m not sure the facts of the cases are similar enough as those were medical records and the improper disposal violated public health code. In this case, I’m not sure what, if any, law was violated, other perhaps, than burning the records on property not licensed for waste disposal. It will be interesting to see if Ms. Fitzgerald is ever charged with anything.

Category: Business SectorExposurePaperU.S.

Post navigation

← NY: Buffet employee pleads guilty to identity theft
New York Man Pleads Guilty In Huge Stolen Identity Refund Fraud Case →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Resource: Insider Threat reports
  • Za: Cyber extortionist sentenced to eight years in jail
  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.