DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

N.M. Case Tests How Far CEs Must Go to Meet the Demands of Law Enforcement

Posted on December 14, 2013 by Dissent

AIS Health has an article on a troubling case previously discussed on this blog involving two Gila  Medical Center physicians who cooperated with police requests for increasingly invasive body searches of a man suspected of hiding drugs in his body. The article begins:

Hospital privacy officers on the job long enough have their share of law enforcement representatives who wave handcuffs around hoping to convince medical staff to do what they want, and have fielded some wild requests that strain legal limits from the men (and women) in blue. Hopefully, the HIPAA training privacy officers have done keeps workers from breaking the law, or at least prompts unsure employees to contact them for advice.

But what happened in southwestern New Mexico has baffled even longtime HIPAA experts, and once again gives rise to a discussion about what covered entities (CEs) can versus must do when faced with law enforcement demands or requests.

The allegations laid out in a federal suit filed in the U.S. District Court in New Mexico against Gila Medical Center in Silver City, N.M., and two of its physicians, along with a handful of local police and sheriff’s deputies and a deputy district attorney, tell of a bizarre incident in January in which a man was subjected without his consent to medical procedures, including three enemas, abdominal X-rays and a colonoscopy under anesthesia, at Gila Medical Center.

Read more of this article from Report on Patient Privacy on AIS Health.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Ranking Members Waxman and DeGette Release Memo on Healthcare.gov Security
TN: TBI investigates possible theft of 6,000 state, Metro employees’ personal info (UPDATE 1) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.