DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Omniquad Surf Wall Remote injects string into the browser user agent that identifies users – claim

Posted on December 31, 2013 by Dissent

Back in October 2010, I noted a breach involving managed security services provider Omniquad. Omniquad acknowledged the breach that involved helpdesk tickets leaking online, but the firm’s managing director, Daniel Sobstel, subsequently claimed that Webroot reseller Infosec Technologies started contacting his customers and passing on misleading information about the size of the data breach.

Now I see another report involving Omniquad, this one from an anonymous source on Cryptome:

Now it can be revealed that Omniquad’s latest key product, called Surf Wall Remote, is actually exposing precise client identifying information.

http://www.omniquad.com/surfwall-remote-cloud-hosted-web-security-and-filtering.html

Rather than protecting clients, it reveals their identity to every website they visit.

Surf Wall Remote (SWR) injects an extra string into the browser user agent, that personally identifies the visitor.

Read more on Cryptome. Omniquad did not respond to a request for a statement or comment by the time of this publication.

Category: Business SectorExposure

Post navigation

← Actelis Networks reports theft of safes with Human Resources files
‘Wichcraft notice to customers →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Cyberattack pushes German napkin company into insolvency
  • WMATA Train Operators Arrested in Health Care Fraud Scheme
  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.