DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Missouri Tax Preparer Indicted On Fraud Charges

Posted on January 17, 2014 by Dissent

St. Louis, MO – The owner and operator of a St. Louis County tax preparation service was indicted yesterday for filing false returns and stealing the identities of taxpayers.  RONALD SHONIWA, of Florissant, faces one count of theft of government funds for filing 15 tax returns, which generated more than $50,000 in improperly paid refunds, and two counts of aggravated identity theft for stealing the names and social security numbers of unsuspecting citizens and filing fraudulent returns in their names without their consent or knowledge.

If convicted, the theft of government funds count carries a maximum penalty of ten years, and/or a fine of up to $250,000.  The aggravated identity theft counts are punishable by two years mandatory imprisonment and a fine of up to $250,000.  The sentence for aggravated identity theft runs consecutively to any sentence imposed on the theft of government funds count. In determining the actual sentences, a Judge is required to consider the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which provide recommended sentencing ranges.

Additionally, restitution to the IRS for the improperly paid refunds will be sought.

United States Attorney Richard Callahan noted that “stolen identity refund fraud is a large and growing problem across the country, and the IRS and Justice Department dedicates substantial resources in fighting it, particularly at this time of year.”

“Taxpayers should exercise caution when choosing a tax professional, especially since you will hand over your personal and financial identifying information,” said Sybil Smith, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation.  “They should also be aware of the many free, professional tax preparation services available to low and moderate income taxpayers and senior residents throughout St. Louis.”

This case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Tom Albus is handling the case for the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

As is always the case, charges set forth in an indictment are merely accusations and do not constitute proof of guilt.  Every defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty.

SOURCE: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Missouri


Related:

  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Gatineau gymnastics centre warns members of possible data breach
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • Data BreachesProsper Data Breach Impacts 17.6 Million Accounts
  • Gov't seeks police probe of KT for allegedly obstructing data breach investigation
Category: Business SectorID TheftInsider

Post navigation

← Identity info of every licensed physician in Puerto Rico acquired in hack (updated)
Update to Edgepark Medical Supplies breach (also updated to include Maryland) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.