DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Missouri Tax Preparer Indicted On Fraud Charges

Posted on January 17, 2014 by Dissent

St. Louis, MO – The owner and operator of a St. Louis County tax preparation service was indicted yesterday for filing false returns and stealing the identities of taxpayers.  RONALD SHONIWA, of Florissant, faces one count of theft of government funds for filing 15 tax returns, which generated more than $50,000 in improperly paid refunds, and two counts of aggravated identity theft for stealing the names and social security numbers of unsuspecting citizens and filing fraudulent returns in their names without their consent or knowledge.

If convicted, the theft of government funds count carries a maximum penalty of ten years, and/or a fine of up to $250,000.  The aggravated identity theft counts are punishable by two years mandatory imprisonment and a fine of up to $250,000.  The sentence for aggravated identity theft runs consecutively to any sentence imposed on the theft of government funds count. In determining the actual sentences, a Judge is required to consider the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which provide recommended sentencing ranges.

Additionally, restitution to the IRS for the improperly paid refunds will be sought.

United States Attorney Richard Callahan noted that “stolen identity refund fraud is a large and growing problem across the country, and the IRS and Justice Department dedicates substantial resources in fighting it, particularly at this time of year.”

“Taxpayers should exercise caution when choosing a tax professional, especially since you will hand over your personal and financial identifying information,” said Sybil Smith, Special Agent in Charge of IRS Criminal Investigation.  “They should also be aware of the many free, professional tax preparation services available to low and moderate income taxpayers and senior residents throughout St. Louis.”

This case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation. Assistant United States Attorney Tom Albus is handling the case for the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

As is always the case, charges set forth in an indictment are merely accusations and do not constitute proof of guilt.  Every defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty.

SOURCE: U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Missouri

Category: Business SectorID TheftInsider

Post navigation

← Identity info of every licensed physician in Puerto Rico acquired in hack (updated)
Update to Edgepark Medical Supplies breach (also updated to include Maryland) →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack
  • Sweden under cyberattack: Prime minister sounds the alarm
  • Former CIA Analyst Sentenced to Over Three Years in Prison for Unlawfully Transmitting Top Secret National Defense Information
  • FIN6 cybercriminals pose as job seekers on LinkedIn to hack recruiters

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe
  • AI tools collect and store data about you from all your devices – here’s how to be aware of what you’re revealing
  • 23andMe Privacy Ombudsman Urges User Consent Pre-Data Sale

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.