DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Report of the Health Data Research Forum: Office of the Information & Privacy Commissioner for B.C. and the B.C. Ministry of Health

Posted on February 17, 2014 by Dissent

From the report:

On December 9, 2013, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia (OIPC) and the B.C. Ministry of Health (MoH) convened a meeting of 38 representatives from the health research community and its stakeholders in British Columbia. The attendees were invited to come together to discuss and seek solutions on timely access to, and appropriate use of, health data under the stewardship of the MoH and health authorities for research, evaluation, planning and quality improvement while maintaining academic independence and enhancing privacy protections and security safeguards. Discussion included, but was not limited to:

  • The current state of health data access for research and health system innovation in B.C.;
  • Best practices for improving access to health data for research purposes;
  • Methods to ensure strong privacy protections and security safeguards; and
  • Principles for an improved future state with identified priority action items for continuous improvement.

Moreover, this forum built upon previous efforts to enhance timely and appropriate access to health data by identifying opportunities, barriers and solutions to health data access discussed in the OIPC’s Report of the Roundtable Discussion on Access to Data for Health Research – held on June 25, 2012 and the efforts of the MoH to implement recommendations following three recent health data breaches and the associated investigations. This report serves as the record of the discussions of the Health Data Research Forum held on December 9, 2013.

[…]

The key recommendations for the next 12 months to develop robust and enabling privacy and security frameworks include:

  • Reviewing the role of the Data Stewardship Committee (DSC);
  • Designing proportionate and tailored privacy and security framework;
  • Articulated and common principles within the GHISA and training for the principles and framework developed in the GHISA;
  • Standardized data request, review and approval process within health authorities;
  • Clearly identified roles and responsibilities for all parties involved;
  • Clarification on the “use for contact purposes” in the FIPPA S.35 (1)(a)(i);
  • Acceptable alternatives to encryption;
  • Workshops to review existing privacy and security frameworks and work towards a harmonized approach; and
  • Develop a library of Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs).

The key long-term recommendations to develop robust and enabling privacy and security frameworks include:

  • Mechanisms to keep the framework current;
  • Clear guidelines to researchers for safe storage of personal health and/or sensitive information;
  • Consistent standards for data linking regarding identification;
  • Data Stewardship Committee guidance on sensitivity of data;
  • Population Data BC to have access to HealthIdeas; and
  • Defined criteria for low-risk data regarding the potential identification of subjects.

You can download the full report here (pdf).

No related posts.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← NHS admits new medical records database could pose privacy risk
Wachovia customer sues bank for failing to protect his account and then falsely fingering him to the feds →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Police disrupt “Diskstation” ransomware gang attacking NAS devices
  • Meta fixes bug that could leak users’ AI prompts and generated content
  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Attorney General James Leads Coalition Urging Congress to Protect Americans from Masked ICE Agents
  • Attorney General Tong Announces $85,000 Settlement with TicketNetwork for Violations of the Connecticut Data Privacy Act​
  • Fourth Circuit upholds West Virginia ban on abortion pills
  • Meta fixes bug that could leak users’ AI prompts and generated content
  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.