DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Wyndham's motion to dismiss FTC data security complaint denied

Posted on April 7, 2014 by Dissent

One of the cases I’ve been covering on this blog is LabMD‘s challenge to the FTC’s authority to enforce data security in the health care sector. In its recently filed complaint in federal court in Georgia, LabMD raises some of the same issues raised by Wyndham in federal court in New Jersey, including the issue of promulgating regulations prior to enforcement so that there is fair notice. But the LabMD suit also raises some additional issues such as whether by enacting HIPAA, Congress intended it to be the sole agency enforcing data security of protected health information.

Today, Judge Esther Salas of the federal court in New Jersey rejected Wyndham’s arguments and denied their motion to dismiss.  In her opinion, she held that the FTC does have the authority to enforce data security, and it does not have to promulgate regulations prior to enforcement. Her ruling also affirms FTC’s position that small harm to a lot of people constitutes “significant” harm or injury under the FTC Act.

I reached out to Michael Daughterty of LabMD to get his response to today’s ruling in the Wyndham case, and he provided this statement:

The closer one looks at the LabMD case compared to the Wyndham case, one will see fewer and fewer similarities, but it is still disappointing, but not surprising, that an Article III judge would set aside the concern for defendant’s rights and allow this case to continue. The FTC has not been assigned jurisdiction in data security and has not promulgated rules or standards. The world cannot read minds. Judges need to step in an have the strength to look at the big picture.

It appears the judge put that aside to protect potential victims, and while that may appear admirable, rulings such as this validate and enable agency overreach, do nothing to protect future victims of cybercrimes, and will further deny the business community’s right to know what is expected of them. The judge and FTC have taken the easy way out, made themselves look good, and done nothing to solve the overall problem of data security that is so important to all of us. The effectiveness of the courts and FTC is sorely lacking.


Related:

  • Maintenance Note
  • CISA Alert: Reported Supply Chain Compromise Affecting XZ Utils Data Compression Library, CVE-2024-3094
  • System Status Note
  • System Status Note
  • Fraudster's fake data breach claims should remind media to be careful what we report
  • "Pompompurin" taken into custody after violating conditions of pre-sentencing release on bond (1)
Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Federal court denies Wyndham Hotels & Resorts’ motion to dismiss FTC’s complaint
Ie: Inquiry into data breach at college →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Checkout.com Discloses Data Breach After Extortion Attempt
  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • OpenAI fights order to turn over millions of ChatGPT conversations
  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.