DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

How to lose a customer with one email gaffe, Tuesday edition

Posted on April 22, 2014 by Dissent

An Account Executive at Square wanted to introduce herself to clients in her area, so she sent a friendly email to them today:

Hi there,

I wanted to reach out to let you know my team realigned territories and I will be your new point of contact moving forward.

I’d love to set up a call to introduce myself and learn more about your business.

Please let me know what day/time works best for you.

Thanks,
[Name redacted by DataBreaches.net]

Unfortunately, the account executive used the To: field instead of the BCC: field, thereby exposing 26 recipients’ email addresses to each other. Some of the email addresses incorporated the individuals’ names in part or whole.

One of the recipients immediately cancelled their account, responding:

Congratulations — You just leaked all of the account e-mail addresses in your territory. Please contact whoever is in charge of security and cancel my account immediately.

I want to see a response in the next two hours telling me that you are handling the problem and canceling my account. I will re-evaluate whether I will sign up again after I hear your explanation and how you plan to  prevent future lapses.

Thank you,
[Name redacted by DataBreaches.net]

Within hours, the hapless account executive replied:

Dear [Redacted],

I went ahead and deactivated your Square account. I sincerely apologize for my mistake and have notified my manager. I can assure you that we have been working to take the appropriate steps to resolve this issue.

I would be happy to jump on a call with a member of our security team to talk more about your concerns and how we can be of any additional help. If you would like to take this route please let me know a time that is good for you.

Once again, this is a mistake we are taking very seriously and I sincerely apologize.

Best Regards,

[name and phone number redacted by DataBreaches.net]

“How they can be of any additional help?” The customer doesn’t need additional help. THEY need a plan to keep customers’ information protected.

Related posts:

  • Forbes Breach Email Statistics
  • TeamGhostShell posts “master list” of 548 leaks (so far)
Category: Business SectorExposure

Post navigation

← Iowa State IT staff discover unauthorized access to servers
Healthcare security stuck in Stone Age →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Mississippi Law Firm Sues Cyber Insurer Over Coverage for Scam
  • Ukrainian Hackers Wipe 47TB of Data from Top Russian Military Drone Supplier
  • Computer Whiz Gets Suspended Sentence over 2019 Revenue Agency Data Breach
  • Ministry of Defence data breach timeline
  • Hackers Can Remotely Trigger the Brakes on American Trains and the Problem Has Been Ignored for Years
  • Ransomware in Italy, strike at the Diskstation gang: hacker group leader arrested in Milan
  • A year after cyber attack, Columbus could invest $23M in cybersecurity upgrades
  • Gravity Forms Breach Hits 1M WordPress Sites
  • Stormous claims to have protected health info on 600,000 patients of North Country Healthcare. The patient data appears fake. (2)
  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The EU’s Plan To Ban Private Messaging Could Have a Global Impact (Plus: What To Do About It)
  • A Balancing Act: Privacy Issues And Responding to A Federal Subpoena Investigating Transgender Care
  • Here’s What a Reproductive Police State Looks Like
  • Meta investors, Zuckerberg to square off at $8 billion trial over alleged privacy violations
  • Australian law is now clearer about clinicians’ discretion to tell our patients’ relatives about their genetic risk
  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.