DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Class action lawsuit filed against Maricopa County Community Colleges District

Posted on April 30, 2014 by Dissent

A law firm that had filed notices of claim against MCCCD over its 2013 breach that exposed the information of almost 2.5 million current and former students, employees, and vendors, has now filed a class action lawsuit.

On Monday, April 28, 2014, Gallagher & Kennedy filed a class action lawsuit in the Superior Court of Arizona against the Maricopa County Community College District for having exposed and compromised the private, confidential personal information of an estimated 2.5 million current and former students, applicants, parents, employees, and others.

You can download a copy of the complaint here (pdf). The named plaintiffs all became victims of ID theft at some point after the 2013 breach and while it may be difficult to prove that it was from this breach, there’s more than enough in this complaint for it to survive any motion for dismissal based on standing or lack of actual injury.

Meanwhile, several sources tell DataBreaches.net that MCCCD is continuing to stonewall all attempts to obtain public records related to the 2011 breach and the 2013 breach by attempting to hide behind claims that because personnel matters are involved, the records are exempt from disclosure. Hopefully, the courts will straighten them out on that. Particularly distressing, employees who claim to have been railroaded and falsely accused of responsibility for the 2013 breach have been denied access to reports that they need to defend themselves against disciplinary action by MCCCD.

If the taxpayers of Arizona aren’t the richest in the country, they should be up in arms over the money these breaches have cost taxpayers and they should be demanding full transparency and accountability by MCCCD and its governing board. Instead, they are getting what appears to be a massive attempt to cover up what may be serious negligence in responding to recommendations by both an outside forensics firm and MCCCD’s own IT personnel following the 2011 breach. Although MCCCD has attempted to point the finger at some employees, several employees have pointed out that they actually filed a grievance when MCCCD failed to heed their recommendations urging better security of servers housing personally identifiable information. MCCCD’s IT security deficiencies were also noted in state audits in 2011 and 2012, and yet were still unremediated by the time of the 2013 breach.

Because there has been so much finger-pointing and so little access to documents that could prove what was done – or not done – and when, DataBreaches.net continues to call for a full and transparent investigation of the two breaches by independent parties.

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation SectorHackU.S.

Post navigation

← MO: Public housing manager charged with identity theft for tax refund fraud
U. North Carolina Wilmington reports yet another security incident →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.