DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

What's with all these attacks on doctors' e-mail accounts – and what are you doing about it?

Posted on May 10, 2014 by Dissent

Sometimes it takes a few breaches before I notice a trend or general issue that I think needs to be addressed. This week, I found myself looking at so many reports of doctors’ e-mail accounts being compromised that I decided the topic deserved a post of its own.

If you do not know what breaches I’m referring to, consider this: in January, Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI), Baylor Health, and KentuckyOne all had doctors at a number of their facilities fall for phishing scams that compromised doctors’ e-mail accounts. The e-mails in those accounts contained unencrypted PHI.

Franciscan Medical Group (part of CHI) notified 8,300 patients, Baylor Health notified 8,480 patients at four of their facilities, and KentuckyOne notified 3,500 patients. That’s a lot of patients who had PHI exposed and potentially misused because doctors had unencrypted PHI in emails stored on their computers or on the health systems’ servers.

And then today, we learned that CHI had a second breach this year involving doctors’ e-mail accounts. This time, CHI itself was the victim of DNS hijacking and the attacker was able to redirect all e-mails addressed to the catholichealth.net domain – the domain that hosted the mail server for doctors.

In a complaint it filed in federal court against the “John Doe” Hacker, CHI did not provide an actual estimate of how many e-mails from other doctors, laboratories, or patients had been redirected between March 25 and March 30, but they estimate that it was a lot. And as I noted in my post about that breach, it’s not clear to me whether all those e-mails were deleted from their server, which would mean that potentially a lot of patients had PHI exposed or compromised, but CHI may have no way of knowing who to notify or what PHI was involved.

So should hospitals and health systems allow doctors to have unencrypted PHI in their e-mail accounts?

Baylor Health declined to discuss their policy with PHIprivacy.net, saying that they do not discuss their internal security policies. They may not discuss them with us, but I think we should discuss them – theirs and the many others who may  leave PHI at risk of doctors falling for phishing scams or DNS hijacking.

Given that we’ve already had tens of thousands patients’ PHI exposed or compromised by attacks on  doctors’ e-mail accounts already this year, might this be a good time for HHS to publish some guidance or a reminder about protecting PHI in e-mails?


Related:

  • Safaricom-Backed M-TIBA Victim of a Possible Data Breach Affecting Millions of Kenyans
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
  • Massachusetts hospitals Heywood, Athol say outage was a cybersecurity incident
Category: Health Data

Post navigation

← Catholic Health Initiatives victim of DNS hijack; doctors' e-mails redirected (updated)
MLB's A-Rod inquiry: Investigators were told documents were stolen, but bought records anyway, officials say →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.