DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Follow-up to NYC Health & Hospitals Corp. breach that affected 1.7M

Posted on May 29, 2014 by Dissent

Sometimes, it takes years before we find out how HHS responded to a breach. A breach involving New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation that affected 1.7 million patients is a case in point.

As reported previously on this blog, the breach occurred in December 2010 when backup tapes were stolen from the unlocked vehicle of HHC’s business associate.

So what did OCR find in its investigation?

They note:

Upon discovery of the breach, the CE filed a police report to recover the stolen items and provided breach notification to HHS, the media, and affected individuals. As a result of OCR’s investigation, the CE terminated its BA agreement and installed encryption software on backup media. The breach incident involved a BA and occurred prior to the September 23, 2013, compliance date. OCR verified that the CE had a proper BA agreement in place that restricted the BA’s use and disclosure of PHI and required the BA to safeguard all PHI.

So it sounds like HHC did not incur any penalties or serious conditions as a result of the breach, and the business associate lost their contract. That sounds about right if the BA did not comply with its contractual obligations to protect the protected health information.

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← Data breach affects 20,000 Utah credit union members
Union Labor Life Insurance notifies 46,771 after laptop with personal info was stolen from their offices →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.