DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Vodacom exposed some subscriber details after software update; issue fixed

Posted on November 1, 2014 by Dissent

On October 27, Business Tech reported:

Vodacom is providing information which uniquely identifies you as a subscriber to websites you visit while on its data network.

This was revealed by an online tool created by security researcher, Kenneth White.

Among the data, Vodacom subscribers are inadvertently providing to web servers their phone number and a unique identifier for their device called the IMEI/SV.

Recent media reports suggest that this data is being sent to web servers because Vodacom is modifying the web traffic of its subscribers.

In particular, it is injecting an additional hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) header into the messages subscribers send to servers when requesting items such as web pages.

When asked about the apparent data leak, Vodacom said it is still investigating the issue as a matter of urgency.

And apparently, they did. On October 30, Business Tech reported:

Vodacom says it has fixed an issue which caused subscriber phone numbers and device identifiers (IMEI/SV) to be sent to websites when accessing them from its data network.

Richard Boorman, who is a spokesperson for the network, said that they recently ran a software update to increase the security of some of the services it offers on the network.

Queried about what this security upgrade entailed, Vodacom said that it wanted to switch from RADIUS to LDAP authentication.

In an interview on CapeTalk, Boorman said that the update happened around two weeks ago:

“Thanks to the MyBroadband investigation, we identified a bug in this update which means that in some cases the cellphone number and IMEI number were sporadically visible to other websites,” Boorman said.

“As soon as we were made aware, we reversed the software update and are now developing a fix,” he said. “We thank MyBroadband and its members for bringing this to our attention and helping with a speedy resolution.”

Now that’s the way to respond to a notification or inquiry!


Related:

  • Landmark civil penalty of AU$5.8 million issued under Australia’s Privacy Act
  • How many courts have had sealed and sensitive files exposed by one vendor's error?
  • Legal Aid Agency chief admits difficulties understanding impact of cyberattack
  • Revealed: Afghan data breach after MoD official left laptop open on train
  • US company with access to biggest telecom firms uncovers breach by nation-state hackers
  • Canada says hacktivists breached water and energy facilities
Category: Business SectorExposureNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Update: Tutor in Corona del Mar High grade-hacking scandal arrested at LAX
Luck Played Role in Discovery of Data Breach at JPMorgan Affecting Millions →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.