DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

IE: Update to HSE laptop theft

Posted on November 13, 2014 by Dissent

There’s an update to a breach noted yesterday on this blog.

Highland Radio now reports that there were 180 children whose data were on the stolen laptop  HSE’s Speech and Language Therapy Service in Donegal.

Even more noteworthy, however, they report that the laptop was “fully encrypted.”

If that’s the case, I am puzzled that the Data Protection Commissioner had ordered HSE to notify parents of the breach. As security professional Brian Honan helpfully points out, Principle 4 of the non-mandatory Personal Data Security Breach Code of Practice reads:

 If the data concerned is protected by technological measures such as to make it unintelligible to any person who is not authorised to access it,the data controller may conclude that there is no risk to the data and therefore no need to inform data subjects. Such a conclusion would only be justified where the technological measures (such as encryption) were of a high standard.

So did the DPC direct HSE to disclose because the level of encryption wasn’t of a high standard? Or are government agencies expected to report even if encryption is deployed? If any Irish lawyers would like to jump in and explain, that would be appreciated.

In any event, I am puzzled that  HSE didn’t say the laptop was fully encrypted in their notification letter.  Surely that would have been somewhat reassuring to parents being notified, even if the encryption level wasn’t sufficient to trigger any safe harbor.

 

Category: Uncategorized

Post navigation

← New York resident charged with fraud, identity theft in Fort Lee
UK: Unencrypted data of 45,000 patients shared by south west ambulance bosses despite "no justifiable legal reason" to do so →

4 thoughts on “IE: Update to HSE laptop theft”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 13, 2014 at 5:28 pm

    Mandatory breach disclosure is not a requirement in Ireland, unless in certain industries such as telcos. As a result many organisations are not completely familiar with the voluntary code of practise for reporting breaches. So some organisations, especially in the government sector, will report a breach even if the device is encrypted. If you review the Data Protection Commissioner’s Annual Report you will see many reports that are below the minimum requirements set in the Code of Practise. Also each organisation is supposed to keep a record of all breaches whether they are reported or not.

    So all the above can lead to some confusion over when, how, and what should be reported resulting from a breach

    1. Anonymous says:
      November 13, 2014 at 5:35 pm

      Thanks so much for de-muddifying (is that a word?) the situation over there. 🙂

      1. Anonymous says:
        November 13, 2014 at 6:14 pm

        no problem, doing the de-modifying is what keeps me in a job 🙂

        1. Anonymous says:
          November 13, 2014 at 6:59 pm

          So here’s your next question, my friend:

          If there’s no mandatory breach notification, how can the DPC order any agency to notify? It would seem to me that he could only “strongly recommend.” Even if an entity didn’t disclose, and the DPC opened an investigation, what’s the worst the could happen to HSE in this situation?

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.