DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Incident Summary #4: Service provider inadvertently discloses email addresses of nearly 300 customers in mass email

Posted on December 20, 2014 by Dissent

Posted yesterday by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada:

Service provider inadvertently discloses email addresses of nearly 300 customers in mass email

Incident

A customer of a service provider received a routine email from the service provider advising her of when her seasonal service would be reconnected. However, she noticed that the email had also been simultaneously sent to many other customers, whose email addresses were clearly visible, as was her own, in the address field. As a result, the customer alerted our Office about the incident.

Outcome

The service provider advised our Office that nine mass emails had occurred on that day, involving nearly 300 email addresses of individual customers. The organization explained that in these mass emails, the email address of each recipient had been displayed and shared with multiple customers since the addresses had been entered into the “cc” field rather than the “bcc” field.

Within the first half hour of detecting the error, the organization made attempts to recall all unopened emails to mitigate the impact on customers. Each customer impacted by the incident received a subsequent email from the organization, containing an apology for the error, a description of it and the actions that were taken to rectify the situation. Customers were also given the contact information of a supervisor with whom they could discuss the incident if they wished. Later, communications were sent to, and learning sessions were held with, managers, supervisors and company leaders to inform them of the incident, with a view to implementing a more secure, automated process/system for sending out mass emails.

Consequently, within a week of the incident, a new process for best practices when sending out mass emails was established for the organization. The new process includes: (a) avoiding mass emails, in general, and using alternative and more personal methods of contact (i.e., phone) wherever possible; (b) involving the marketing team for mass emails that need to be sent; (c) requiring supervisor and manager review and approval of mass emails prior to being sent; (d) using a mail merger program to ensure confidentialilty; and (e) ensuring that mass emails being sent do not contain the confidential information of customers.

Final Comment

The service provider was able to demonstrate to our Office that it implemented best practices for sending mass e-mails in response to this incident. Our Office strongly encourages other organizations subject to the Act to implement similar processes to avoid an inadvertent disclosure of personal information when sending a mass email to its customers.

Category: Business SectorExposureNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← VA: Security Incident Involving James Madison University Network
Court case places patient-physician relationship in the balance →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Turkish Group Hacks Zero-Day Flaw to Spy on Kurdish Forces
  • Cyberattacks on Long Island Schools Highlight Growing Threat
  • Dior faces scrutiny, fine in Korea for insufficient data breach reporting; data of wealthy clients in China, South Korea stolen
  • Administrator Of Online Criminal Marketplace Extradited From Kosovo To The United States
  • Twilio denies breach following leak of alleged Steam 2FA codes
  • Personal information exposed by Australian Human Rights Commission data breach
  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.