DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Dear Lawmakers, Your New Breach Notice Laws Should Address These Issues

Posted on January 21, 2015 by Dissent

Craig Hoffman of BakerHostetler offers his thoughts about proposed legislation on Data Privacy Monitor.

Here’s one example of what Craig thinks needs to be clarified in any bill:

Owner/Licensor.  Most state laws require the “owner” of the “personal information” that was stolen to notify the affected individual, while a “licensor” or “processor” of the data is required to notify the “owner” which in turn is required to notify the individuals.  The dichotomy of “owners” versus “licensors” and “processors” does not neatly apply to how data is collected and used.  Payment cards provide a good example.  Banks that issue the cards often assert that they are the owner of the card data.  When a card is swiped at a retailer, many retailers only use the data from the magnetic stripe to gain authorization for the transaction (and they do not store that data).  If payment card data is stolen while it is being routed through the retailer’s system to its processor, it’s hard to view the retailer as the “owner.”  If not, then is the retailer supposed to notify the issuing bank who would then notify the cardholder?

Good question.

No related posts.

Category: Federal

Post navigation

← New Congress to hold first data breach hearing
University of Oregon unlawfully releases 22,000 pages with confidential faculty, staff and student records →

2 thoughts on “Dear Lawmakers, Your New Breach Notice Laws Should Address These Issues”

  1. JJ says:
    January 22, 2015 at 1:53 am

    The exemption for federally regulated entities like banks needs removed. The federal regs are very weak on requiring disclosures.

    A mandatory maximum time for disclosing despite law enforcement needs set. I am aware of companies that asked LE if they should delay disclosures. LE will never say no and the request was just to delay disclosures.

    Mandatory disclosure to the state AG needs to happen for all breaches in excess of ten records and the AG needs to publicly display all of them. Ten records is the threshold for Fannie Mae breaches so it is not onerous.

    All losses in any channel, not just electronic, need disclosed.

    1. Dissent says:
      January 22, 2015 at 7:20 am

      We agree. I had outlined my preliminary concerns about the proposal here, but since writing that, have seen other concerns. Thanks for adding your thoughts.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems
  • 222,000 customer records allegedly from Manhattan Parking Group leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach
  • Nestle USA Settles Suit Over Job-Application Medical Questions

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.