DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Sonoma County social worker sued for snooping in applicant’s files

Posted on March 9, 2015 by Dissent

Sometimes employees snoop in healthcare or government databases just out of curiosity. Other times, they snoop to obtain information to misuse. That misuse could involve financial fraud such as tax refund fraud, or it could involve tormenting your neighbor, according to a lawsuit in Santa Rosa, California.

Paul Payne of the Press Democrat reported on a case where a man has sued his neighbor, a Sonoma County social worker, for misusing her access to the county Human Services Development database to taunt him and harass him:

Eugene Alexeev, a disabled car mechanic originally from the Soviet Union, claims Lizbeth De Mejia, a county Human Services Department eligibility worker, shouted details about his lack of employment and reliance on public assistance in a dispute over backyard watering.

When Alexeev reported the apparent breach to county officials, he was told it never happened and that he shouldn’t contact them anymore, he said.

The case has gone to court this week, and a jury will decide if Alexeev is entitled to damages for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Because Alexeev complained, the county investigated and although they initially found no unauthorized access to their database, a second county review conducted after an electronic tracking device was placed on his file that his neighbor had, indeed, accessed his records. Alexeev complains that the county never notified him of their findings that there had been a breach.

That said, it doesn’t sound like he has any clear evidence that she accessed his files before she began taunting him publicly. But is it a reasonable inference that she learned of his situation just by living next door to him? Would she really have known, as he claims, that he and his mother were receiving assistance from the county’s medical services program and that they had no money – just by living next door to him?

De Mejia, who maintains she didn’t look at the files until after Alexeev complained, was disciplined with a pay cut but remains a part-time employee. Her lawyer suggested she knew about Alexeev’s unemployment and finances from living beside him for so long.

So will the jury find Alexeev has provided enough evidence to prove improper access, and that her conduct constitutes invasion of privacy? We’ll have to wait for the jury’s verdict.

Related posts:

  • NY: Former Branch Manager Of Bank Pleads Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To Cashing Over $400,000 In Fraudulently Obtained Tax Refund Checks
  • Jury rules in favor of Sonoma County employee in privacy case
  • “I’m Not Pro-Russia and I’m Not a Terrorist!” —- InfraGard and Airbus Hacker “USDoD” Unveils His New Campaigns
Category: Breach IncidentsGovernment SectorHealth DataInsiderU.S.

Post navigation

← Tort of intrusion upon seclusion and breaches of personal health information: the Court of Appeal decision in Hopkins v. Kay
Valley Community Healthcare notifies patients after laptop with their information was stolen →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.