DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Seven Sacramento Residents Indicted for Identity and Mail Theft Scheme

Posted on June 4, 2015 by Dissent

A federal grand jury returned a 13-count indictment today against seven Sacramento residents, charging them with conspiracy, access device fraud, aggravated identity theft, and possession of stolen mail, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced.

The indictment alleges that co-defendants Steven Khamkeuanekeo, 33, Kay Lee, 26, Chee Yang, 27, Frank Her, 36, Amy Her, 33, Lee Yang, 33, and Tou Her, 36, conspired to use unauthorized access devices at large retailers and stole victims’ identities through stolen mail.

According to the indictment, from July 2014 through April 2015, the conspirators obtained personal information from victims through various methods. The conspirators then used that information to create counterfeit access devices or otherwise used unauthorized access devices to obtain things of value in excess of $1,000. Part of the scheme involved using Target store account numbers to buy large amounts of electronics and other goods at Target locations throughout the Sacramento area. The indictment further alleges that one of the defendants, Frank Her, possessed device-making equipment with the intent to defraud.

In all, the indictment alleges that at least 500 counterfeit and unauthorized access devices were possessed, used, produced, or trafficked by members of the conspiracy, and over 2200 victims have been identified to date as having had their identities or mail compromised as a result of the conspiracy.

This case is the product of an investigation by the United States Postal Inspection Service. Assistant United States Attorney Matthew M. Yelovich is prosecuting the case.

If the defendants are convicted, they face maximum statutory penalties ranging from five to 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Any sentence, however, would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables. The charges are only allegations; the defendants are presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

SOURCE: U.S.A.O, Eastern District of California

Related posts:

  • Operation Phish Phry reels in 100 in U.S. and Egypt
  • Eight Individuals Face Fraud, Identity Theft Charges Involving Possession of Names, Information of More Than 143,000 Individuals
  • IRS’s Top 10 Identity Theft Prosecutions
  • Two charged in superseding indictment for their roles in a $30 million bank fraud and ID theft ring
Category: ID Theft

Post navigation

← OPM notifying 4 million current and former federal employees of hack
Human error to blame as UK data breach investigations surge →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud
  • Swiss Health Foundation Radix Hit by Cyberattack Affecting Federal Data
  • Russian hackers get 7 and 5 years in prison for large-scale cyber attacks with ransomware, over 60 million euros in bitcoins seized
  • Bolton Walk-In Clinic patient data leak locked down (finally!)
  • 50 Customers of French Bank Hit by Insider SIM Swap Scam
  • Ontario health agency atHome ordered to inform 200,000 patients of March data breach
  • Fact-Checking Claims By Cybernews: The 16 Billion Record Data Breach That Wasn’t
  • Horizon Healthcare RCM discloses ransomware attack in December
  • Disgruntled IT Worker Jailed for Cyber Attack, Huddersfield
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New
  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.