DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

National Association of Attorneys General: Federal Data Breach Legislation Should Not Preempt States

Posted on July 7, 2015 by Dissent

The National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) sent a letter today to congressional leaders urging them to ensure that federal data breach legislation preserves states’ ability to enforce state laws in order to protect consumers from data breaches and identity theft. Most of the federal bills related to data security and data breach notification pending in Congress preempts the states.

“Preempting state law would make consumers less protected than they are right now,” reads the letter signed by 47 state and territorial attorneys general. “Our constituents are continually asking for greater protection. If states are limited by federal legislation, we will be unable to respond to their concerns.”

States are on the front lines in helping consumers deal with the repercussions of a data breach. In addition, attorneys general regularly investigate the causes of data breaches to determine whether data collectors who experience a breach used reasonable data security practices and notified consumers of the breaches according to the requirements of state law. States began adopting data breach notification laws in 2003, and some have since required data collectors experiencing breaches to directly notify the attorney general in order to respond more quickly to concerned consumers.

The NAAG letter addresses several points:

· It is important that any federal legislation ensure that states can continue to enforce breach notification requirements under their own state laws. States should also be assured continued flexibility to adapt their state laws to respond to changes in technology and data collection.

· States should also be able to maintain their ability to place requirements on data collectors that go beyond those required at the federal level.

Federal law works best when it is supplemented by state enforcement and innovative state law.

The NAAG letter can be found here.

SOURCE: National Association of Attorneys General


Related:

  • Some lower-tier ransomware gangs have formed a new RaaS alliance -- or have they? (1)
  • Another plastic surgery practice fell prey to a cyberattack that acquired patient photos and info
  • How a hacking gang held Italy’s political elites to ransom
  • Uncovering Qilin attack methods exposed through multiple cases
  • Predatory Sparrow Strikes: Coordinated Cyberattacks Seek to Cripple Iran's Critical Infrastructure
  • Ex-CISA head thinks AI might fix code so fast we won't need security teams
Category: Breach LawsCommentaries and AnalysesFederalOf Note

Post navigation

← Lizard Squad hacker convicted on 50,000 hacking charges
Adobe expected to issue Flash Player patch for Hacking Team 0-day →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.