DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

NYS Comptroller Audit of Onteora Central School District: Information Technology

Posted on July 22, 2015 by Dissent

From the well-there’s-certainly-room-for-improvement dept.:

Scope and Objective

The objective of our audit was to determine whether the District’s IT assets were adequately safeguarded for the period July 1, 2013 through November 5, 2014. We extended our review of data extracted from the District’s computers and networks through the end of our fieldwork March 3, 2015. Our audit addressed the following related question:

• Did the Board and District officials provide adequate oversight of IT assets?

Audit Results

The Board and District officials need to improve controls over the District’s IT assets. We found that the Board did not establish an adequate acceptable use policy, a computer security plan, a disaster recovery plan, policies and procedures for the disposal of computer equipment or a policy for security awareness training. In addition, the District’s service level agreement (SLA) with the BOCES for network support specialists did not include written terms defining the service level objectives and performance indicators, roles and responsibilities, nonperformance impact, security procedures, reporting requirements, and, review/update and approval processes. The SLA also did not clearly identify who was responsible for various aspects of the District’s IT environment. Without these policies and a comprehensive SLA, the Board does not have adequate assurance that employees and contractors understand their responsibilities to ensure that the District’s IT assets are secure.

We also found that the District did not keep an inventory of software licenses and its hardware inventory records were not accurate and up-to-date. Of the 31 items that should have been tagged and entered into the inventory system, 18 items (or 58 percent), including tablets and wireless streaming devices, were not included in the inventory system. Without an accurate inventory of computer and technology equipment, District officials cannot be assured that these assets are adequately accounted for and protected from loss, theft, misuse and obsolescence. Further, District officials cannot ensure that the software programs were authorized by IT management and licenses were obtained legally, as required by the District’s acceptable use policy. Furthermore, although the District used a program to filter web content, we identified sites that were not reviewed for actual content. We reviewed 35 sites visited in the “unknown” category and found that 13 sites had content in blocked categories. As a result, users could access inappropriate websites and put the District’s network at risk.

Full audit report available here (pdf).

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation Sector

Post navigation

← When Is it Ethical to Publish Stolen Data?
Ca: Victoria urologist suspended, fined $20,000 for breach of privacy →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Google: Hackers target Salesforce accounts in data extortion attacks
  • The US Grid Attack Looming on the Horizon
  • US govt login portal could be one cyberattack away from collapse, say auditors

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act
  • 23andMe Bankruptcy Judge Ponders Trump Bill’s Injunction Impact
  • Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.