DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

BNY Mellon accused of leaking confidential client data

Posted on August 31, 2015 by Dissent

A press release from Novick & Associates, P.C.:

Another bizarre incident occurred in the ongoing litigation between the sons of renowned East Hampton sculptor Norman Mercer and BNY Mellon (BNYM), which is administering his estate, when the bank improperly turned over personal and financial information about its other trust account beneficiaries residing in the New York Tri-state area.

In its response to court ordered document discovery seeking the production of the minutes of the bank’s Trust Administrative Committee (TAC) meetings dealing with trusts established by the late Norman Mercer, BNYM produced TAC meeting minutes dealing with its other Wealth Management clients.

The information released included client names, account numbers, personal financial and family information in connection with requests for trust distributions as well as the bank’s decision on each request.  After discovering the bank’s mistake, the attorneys representing Howard and David Mercer immediately notified the bank’s outside legal counsel.

This was not the first time BNY Mellon’s incompetence resulted in the bank improperly releasing personal confidential information to the Mercers. The bank had previously turned over social security numbers, bank account numbers and financial information about its co-fiduciaries in the estate of Norman Mercer.

Norman Mercer’s sons, retired West coast businessmen, Howard and David Mercer, are engaged in an ongoing legal battle with BNY Mellon to protect their father’s legacy from the alleged incompetence, negligence and wrongdoing by the bank’s wealth management unit.

The press release does not indicate Novick & Associates’ connection to the case, but yes, they’re representing the plaintiffs.

Attempts to reach BNY Mellon corporate communications for a response were unsuccessful as their contact form did not work in Safari or Chrome attempts.


Related:

  • On Reports of an Alleged Data Breach Involving G-Xchange, Inc. (GCash)
  • NY: Gloversville hit by ransomware attack, paid ransom
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
Category: ExposureFinancial SectorU.S.

Post navigation

← China and Russia are cross-indexing hacked data to target U.S. spies, officials say
Minnesota blames faulty web portal for breach of 18 residents’ driver’s license information →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post hack exposes personal data of John Bolton, almost 10,000 others
  • Draft UK Cyber Security and Resilience Bill Enters UK Parliament
  • Suspected Russian hacker reportedly detained in Thailand, faces possible US extradition
  • Did you hear the one about the ransom victim who made a ransom installment payment after they were told that it wouldn’t be accepted?
  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Maryland Privacy Crackdown Raises Bar for Disclosure Compliance
  • Lawmakers Warn Governors About Sharing Drivers’ Data with Federal Government
  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.