DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

U. of Cincinnati Medical Center not liable for employee’s Facebook post on a patient’s STD (updated)

Posted on November 10, 2015 by Dissent

Kevin Grasha has an update on a breach previously noted on this site.

University of Cincinnati Medical Center can’t be sued after an employee leaked private medical records about a patient who had syphilis, a judge ruled Monday.

The patient, a woman in her early 20s, filed the lawsuit last year. A screen shot of the woman’s private medical records from the hospital was posted on the Facebook group, “Team No Hoes,” in September 2013. The records listed the woman’s diagnosis as “maternal syphilis.” She was pregnant at the time.

Read more on Cincinnati.com.

In a way, and even though the patient may appeal the ruling, this ruling is consistent with other cases where covered entities were found not liable for employees’ egregious conduct that were outside the employee’s scope of work duties. In this case, the employee was reportedly in the financial services department.

It is not known what, if any, action HHS/OCR has taken as a result of their investigation into the incident.

Update: Jeff Drummond’s blog about this case mentions that this case has a different result than Hinchy v. Walgreens, a case that I covered last year, but temporarily forgot about it in writing up the Ohio case.  So we have cases in two states that found no employer liability and one case in a third state that found for the plaintiff/patient.

Category: ExposureHealth DataInsiderU.S.

Post navigation

← Indictment in Atlanta charges three in E*TRADE, Scottrade ID theft and fraud scheme
More than 1,000 Spotify email addresses and passwords leaked. Spotify denies any breach of their system/ →

2 thoughts on “U. of Cincinnati Medical Center not liable for employee’s Facebook post on a patient’s STD (updated)”

  1. Anonymous says:
    November 10, 2015 at 9:08 pm

    I am not responsible for what my employee does with the information I give them and the time I pay them for.

    If my employee causes me and others harm, not my problem.

    If my employee posts a screenshot of all my customers, or of my secret process, not my problem.

    If my employee posts all the emails she has privy to of my best government customers drunken exploits with that 3500$ call girl I paid for to keep the contract, not my problem.

    This better be appealed and won, otherwise I’ll just give up in believing people have certain rights to privacy.

    I’m annoyed at reading this, obviously.

    1. Dissent says:
      November 10, 2015 at 10:28 pm

      The opinion that it’s similar to (mentioned in my post) is a case in NY that did go up to the appellate court, who affirmed the dismissal of that patient’s lawsuit. You can read more about it here: http://www.databreaches.net/ny-court-of-appeals-rules-employer-not-liable-for-actions-of-employee-acting-outside-scope-of-employment/

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hacker steals $223 million in Cetus Protocol cryptocurrency heist
  • Operation ENDGAME strikes again: the ransomware kill chain broken at its source
  • Mysterious Database of 184 Million Records Exposes Vast Array of Login Credentials
  • Mysterious hacking group Careto was run by the Spanish government, sources say
  • 16 Defendants Federally Charged in Connection with DanaBot Malware Scheme That Infected Computers Worldwide
  • Russian national and leader of Qakbot malware conspiracy indicted in long-running global ransomware scheme
  • Texas Doctor Who Falsely Diagnosed Patients as Part of Insurance Fraud Scheme Sentenced to 10 Years’ Imprisonment
  • VanHelsing ransomware builder leaked on hacking forum
  • Hack of Opexus Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
  • ‘Deep concern’ for domestic abuse survivors as cybercriminals expected to publish confidential abuse survivors’ addresses

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Meta may continue to train AI with user data, German court says
  • Widow of slain Saudi journalist can’t pursue surveillance claims against Israeli spyware firm
  • Researchers Scrape 2 Billion Discord Messages and Publish Them Online
  • GDPR is cracking: Brussels rewrites its prized privacy law
  • Telegram Gave Authorities Data on More than 20,000 Users
  • Police secretly monitored New Orleans with facial recognition cameras
  • Cocospy stalkerware apps go offline after data breach

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.