DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Meanwhile, back at the VA….

Posted on December 15, 2015 by Dissent

The VA’s monthly report to Congress for November has been released, and we’re still seeing low-tech breaches involving papers being left where they shouldn’t  be left. Exhibit A, from the VA in Boston:

An 11-page clinic list was found in a public bathroom in a heavily trafficked area. The list had been printed on November 4, and was discovered on November 5. It included full SSN and procedure information on 259 veterans. The VA does not believe it was left there overnight, but there are no cameras in that area that would have shown when it was left there, by whom, or how many people might have looked at it. The list covered all clinic appointments for the month of October. All affected veterans were offered credit monitoring protection services.

Exhibit B: a breach involving paper records at the VA in Miami:

A nurse who was working on a project to convert ICD-9 diagnoses to ICD-10 diagnoses lost a list of names and SSNs of veterans whose diagnoses were to be converted. Two pages of a three page report were lost in the VA Canteen. Each page contained the name and SSNs of 60 Veterans.

As a result of this incident, 126 veterans were offered credit monitoring services.

And what, pray tell, were lists with SSN even doing in the Canteen? Doesn’t the VA have any rules about where documents with PHI do not go?

But not all incidents reported in November involved paper records. An encrypted laptop that was stolen in Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) in Washington, DC also resulted in notifications to 84 veterans.

 

In this incident, QTC, a VA contractor, reported to the Contracting Officer’s Representative that a personal laptop had been stolen. This personal laptop was used by the contractor to support VBA M Data Extraction (MDE) Contract medical exams (and no, I don’t what those exams are, but let’s continue….)

QTC was going to provide credit monitoring for 84 veterans. According to the VA’s incident report, the physician stated that he did not store PHI on the laptop, and QTC stated that doing so is against policy, but they had no way of proving he did not, so they were calling it a data breach. The information that could have been stored was name, SSN, and diagnoses, they said.

So QTC was willing to err on the side of caution and provide credit monitoring. But when the  Information Security Officer  and Privacy Officer completed their investigation, and obtained additional information, it turned out that full  SSN would not have been on the laptop, only name, QTC identification number, and medical information. Not only that, but it turns out that the contract states that VA will provide notification, if needed. So what the contractor was willing to take responsibility for as their breach, the VA wound up having to take responsibility for as their breach. The VA notified the 84 individuals, but because there were no SSN, did not offer any credit monitoring.

Category: ExposureGovernment SectorHealth DataPaperTheftU.S.

Post navigation

← PA: Rivers Casino Hit With Computer Virus
Wish list app from Target springs a major personal data leak →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond
  • Rewards for Justice offers $10M reward for info on RedLine developer or RedLine’s use by foreign governments
  • New evidence links long-running hacking group to Indian government
  • Zaporizhzhia Cyber ​​Police Exposes Hacker Who Caused Millions in Losses to Victims by Mining Cryptocurrency
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector
  • U.S. Enacts Take It Down Act

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.