DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

U. British Columbia statement re: FOI privacy breach

Posted on January 29, 2016 by Dissent

On January 25, 2016, UBC responded to numerous FOI requests related to the resignation of Dr. Arvind Gupta from his post as UBC’s President in August 2015. Due to the large number of requests, and the large number of responsive pages, UBC chose to consolidate these requests and posted a package of 861 responsive pages on its website in PDF format. UBC sent all of the requesters a link to these records. UBC had redacted information from the package in accordance with the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (“FIPPA”). Much of the redacted information constituted Dr. Gupta’s personal information.

On January 27, UBC became aware that some of the redacted information had somehow been accessed from the package and immediately removed the package from UBC’s website. Upon investigation, UBC was able to determine that the release of this information occurred in the following manner. UBC utilizes a software package called Redax, which is the industry standard software for redacting documents in electronic format and producing PDF disclosure packages. Where documents consisting of emails with attachments are converted into a PDF file, hidden copies of any unredacted attachments are embedded in the resulting PDF file. While these attachments are hidden, they can be accessed by a knowledgeable user by clicking on links that are embedded in the PDF file. Therefore, it is necessary to take the additional step of “sanitizing” the PDF file to remove the hidden copies of the unredacted attachments. This “sanitization” step is part of UBC’s standard practice, but was inadvertently omitted in this case.

As a result, a number of files that had been attached to emails were hidden within the package and could be accessed by clicking on links within the records package. Some of these attachments contained information that had been redacted, including personal information of Dr. Gupta. This vulnerability affected only these attachments and did not affect the overwhelming majority of the package.

UBC has prepared a replacement package that does not include any of these hidden attachments. To download it, please click here.

UBC deeply regrets the error that led to this privacy breach. UBC has already notified the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of this breach, and will fully cooperate with any investigation it may undertake. UBC takes its obligations under the FIPPA seriously, both to protect privacy and to respond to access requests in an effective, efficient and secure manner. To that end, UBC has retained an external expert to review its disclosure practices and provide recommendations on any steps that need to be taken to prevent a recurrence.

Hubert Lai, Q.C., University Counsel

SOURCE: University of British Columbia

No related posts.

Category: Education SectorExposureNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Boy arrested over TalkTalk hacking settles case against Twitter
TW: MJIB launches investigation into info leak case, finds alleged mole →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Back from the Brink: District Court Clears Air Regarding Individualized Damages Assessment in Data Breach Cases
  • Multiple lawsuits filed against Doyon Ltd over April 2024 data breach and late notification
  • Chinese hackers suspected in breach of powerful DC law firm
  • Qilin Emerged as The Most Active Group, Exploiting Unpatched Fortinet Vulnerabilities
  • CISA tags Citrix Bleed 2 as exploited, gives agencies a day to patch
  • McDonald’s McHire leak involving ‘123456’ admin password exposes 64 million applicant chat records
  • Qilin claims attack on Accu Reference Medical Laboratory. It wasn’t the lab’s first data breach.
  • Louis Vuitton hit by data breach in Türkiye, over 140,000 users exposed; UK customers also affected (1)
  • Infosys McCamish Systems Enters Consent Order with Vermont DFR Over Cyber Incident
  • Obligations under Canada’s data breach notification law

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • The ICO’s AI and biometrics strategy
  • Trump Border Czar Boasts ICE Can ‘Briefly Detain’ People Based On ‘Physical Appearance’
  • DeleteMyInfo Wins 2025 Digital Privacy Excellence Award from Internet Safety Council
  • TikTok Loses First Appeal Against £12.7M ICO Fine, Faces Second Investigation by DPC
  • German court offers EUR 5000 compensation for data breaches caused by Meta
  • How to Build on Washington’s “My Health, My Data” Act
  • Department of Justice Subpoenas Doctors and Clinics Involved in Performing Transgender Medical Procedures on Children

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.
Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report