DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Initial Release of the Information Security Primer for Evaluating Educational Software

Posted on March 28, 2016 by Dissent

So pleased to see this announcement from Bill Fitzgerald:

One of the unspoken issues in working on security and privacy in educational software is that, while many people are passionate about privacy and security, many people don’t know how to start evaluating software or how to assess any potential risks they might uncover. One of the explicit goals of the District Privacy Evaluation Initiative is to decrease these barriers to entry and to help more people have a more informed conversation about what constitutes sound security and privacy practices. While the full realm of information security is a broad subject, we wanted to provide a concrete starting point. Based on observations of issues we have seen — and continue to see — within software, we compiled a primer and are happy to announce the release of the Information Security Primer for Evaluating Educational Software.

The primary audience for the primer is district staff and education technology vendors, but the usefulness of this information goes far beyond these two primary audiences. We hope and anticipate that it will be used by parents, students, privacy advocates, teachers, and anyone else with an interest in learning more about how to evaluate the security of the software we build and use.

As the title implies, this document is a primer, not a comprehensive guide. We intend for this document to grow and evolve over time. Future versions will include more advanced testing scenarios, but for the initial version, we wanted to provide resources to allow people to learn how to do security reviews safely. We anticipate updates throughout the year, with published “official” releases happening one to two times annually. The “published” version will be available on Graphite, with the working version maintained openly on GitHub.

The primer covers the basics of information security testing, starting with a grounding in responsible disclosure. The tests run in the primer make extensive use of work from the Open Web Application Security Project, or OWASP. The primer leverages the Zed Attack Proxy, an open-source intercepting proxy supported as part of OWASP. The full suite of resources available from OWASP are incredibly valuable, and the content we cover in the primer just scratches the surface. As one example, an item not covered in the primer that should be recommended reading for developers building Web applications is the OWASP Application Security Verification Project.

As with all of our work on the District Privacy Evaluation Initiative, we welcome community involvement and input. If you work at a school or district and would like to get involved in our ongoing work, please sign up! If you would like to contribute to the content of the primer, please join the effort over on GitHub. We will be responding to questions in the issue queue and approving and/or discussing any pull requests we receive.

Getting this primer out was a team effort. Tony Porterfield, Jim Siegl, and Bill Fitzgerald are the primary authors of this text, and Girard Kelly, Jeff Graham, Jenny Pritchett, and Omar Khan provided editing, support, and testing. Without the work of every person on this team, this document wouldn’t exist.

SOURCE: Graphite

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesEducation Sector

Post navigation

← Ca: UBC release of uncensored personal information an ‘honest mistake’: report
Update to #InvestBank hack? →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Why Dumping Sensitive Data on Network Shares is a Liability
  • A militarily degraded Iran may turn to asymmetrical warfare – raising risk of proxy and cyber attacks
  • Pro-Russian hackers disrupt Dutch government websites ahead of NATO summit
  • Iran-Linked Threat Actors Leak Visitors and Athletes’ Data from Saudi Games
  • UK: Oxford City Council still investigating cyberattack from earlier this month
  • Steelmaker Nucor Says Hackers Stole Data in Recent Attack
  • People’s Republic of China cyber threat activity: Cyber Threat Bulletin
  • Ukrainian Web3 security auditing company Hacken suffered an attack that allowed a hacker to create 900 million HAI tokens
  • McLaren provides written notice to 743,131 patients after ransomware attack in July 2024 (2)
  • A state forensics lab was leaking its files. Getting it locked down involved a number of people.

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Sky Views Personal Data as a Potential Weapon in IPTV Piracy War
  • Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests
  • Federal Court Strikes Down HIPAA Reproductive Health Care Privacy Rule
  • The Markup caught 4 more states sharing personal health data with Big Tech
  • Privacy in the Big Sky State: Montana’s Consumer Privacy Law Gets Amended
  • UK Passes Data Use and Access Regulation Bill
  • Officials defend Liberal bill that would force hospitals, banks, hotels to hand over data

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.