DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

FBI: we don’t advise entities to pay ransom demands

Posted on April 1, 2016 by Dissent

While I was at the recent PHI Protection Network conference, I had an opportunity to speak with Ben Stone, Supervisory Special Agent in the FBI’s Pennsylvania Cyber Squad. One of the questions I put to him was why the FBI had been advising companies to pay ransomware demands.

Special Agent Stone told me that that wasn’t the FBI’s official position and that officially, the FBI cannot advise entities one way or the other as to whether to pay a ransom demand. All they can do, in some cases, he told me, is explain that the FBI cannot help them unlock their files if the FBI doesn’t have the means to do so.

Today, Catalin Cimpanu has more on this issue and the FBI’s official position. Their statement was in response to an inquiry sent in December by Senator Ron Wyden, who was apparently reacting to the same news reports I was.

Donald J. Good, Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI’s Cyber Division, apparently answered this letter at the start of February.

Responding the most pressing issue, Mr. Good said the following: “The FBI does not advise victims on whether or not to pay the ransom.”

“The FBI advises that the use of backup files is an effective way to minimize the impact of ransomware and that implementing computer security best practices is the most effective way to prevent ransomware infections,” Mr. Good also add.

“Individuals or businesses that regularly backup their files on an external server or device can scrub their hard drive to remove the ransomware and restore their files from backup. If all individuals and businesses backed up their files, ransomware would not be a profitable business for cyber criminal actors.”

“If none of these precautions have been taken and the individual or business still wants to recover their files, the victim’s remaining alternative is to pay the ransom,” Mr. Good states, emphasizing that it’s not the agency’s custom to push victims towards paying the ransom, but the victim’s choice alone.

You can read the full letter on Softpedia.


Related:

  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Protected health information of 462,000 members of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana involved in Conduent data breach
  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Cyber-Attack On Bectu’s Parent Union Sparks UK National Security Concerns
Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← OH: Private data accidentally exposed by Amherst police personnel
Romanian National “Guccifer” Extradited to Face Hacking Charges →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.