DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Another Bizmatics, Inc. client notifies 7.500 patients of hack

Posted on May 19, 2016 by Dissent

Well, this is a bit different. Lafayette Pain Care, PC in Indiana notified HHS on May 9 about hacking/IT incident that affected 7,500 patients.

In trying to track it down (there’s nothing that I could find on their web site), I came across a media report from May 10 that links this to the Bizmatics, Inc. incident that I’ve covered on this blog as I’ve become aware of clients disclosing the incident to their patients.

But unlike other notifications/clients, Lafayette Pain Care seems to be telling their patients that their data was not accessed at all.

Ron Wilkins reports:

Hackers probed the computer servers of a business that houses the electronic records of Lafayette Pain Care, but the electronic snoops were unable to access any records, said Dale Krynak, the pain care facility’s chief operating officer.

“We buy our electronic health record system from a provider in California, Bizmatics,” Krynak said. “At or around the first of the year, they learned that someone had tried to hack into their system.”

An investigation that included the FBI determined in March that the system had not been compromised, Krynak said.

If that’s the case, why are they reporting this?

Federal rules, however, require Lafayette Pain Care to publish an announcement about the investigation into a possible hacking attempt and state the following information:

  • The pain care center recommends patients review their forms to confirm the accuracy of included listed services.
  • In the event of unauthorized activity, Lafayette Pain Care recommends patients submit a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission by calling 877-438-4338 or online at www.ftcomplaintassistant.gov.
  • A Redemption Code for credit monitoring services will be available to our verified patients who may have been affected.

Excuse me while I go scratch my head. If the forensics and FBI said that the system hadn’t been compromised, why is this reportable under HITECH??


Related:

  • Resource: NY DFS Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance to Address Risks Associated with the Use of Third-Party Service Providers
  • TX: Kaufman County Faces Cybersecurity Attack: Courthouse Computer Operations Disrupted
  • Hotel and Casino near Las Vegas Strip suffers data breach, documents say
  • Bombay High Court Orders Department of Telecommunications to Block Medusa Accounts After Generali Insurance Data Breach
  • Attorney General James Announces Settlement with Wojeski & Company Accounting Firm
  • JFL Lost Up to $800,000 Weekly After Cyberattack, CEO Says No Patient or Staff Data Was Compromised
Category: HackHealth DataSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← “Phineas Fisher” provides tutorial on hacking police sites
Comanche County Memorial Hospital notifies 2,199 patients after contractor’s email gaffe →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says
  • The Case for Making EdTech Companies Liable Under FERPA
  • NHS providers reviewing stolen Synnovis data published by cyber criminals

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation
  • Who’s watching the watchers? This Mozilla fellow, and her Surveillance Watch map

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.