DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Walmart vendor error exposed limited patient information

Posted on June 16, 2016 by Dissent

Walmart, who reported a breach involving pharmacy records in March, has disclosed another breach to HHS. This one, reported June 8, reportedly affected 27,393 patients. Thankfully, it does not seem to have exposed particularly sensitive information.

DataBreaches.net asked Walmart for a statement describing the incident, and received the following statement:

Recently, we learned that the company that processes our patient refund checks experienced a printing error.

This error caused incorrect information to be printed on the letters that accompanied the refund checks sent to customers. As a result, the mailing a customer received may have included another individual’s information, limited to: (1) name, (2) a pharmacy prescription number or an optical order number, (3) the order date, and (4) a refund amount. The city and state of the Walmart or Sam’s Club visited also was included. It should be noted that no Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, financial information, insurance information, addresses, telephone numbers, date-of-birth, or prescription names were disclosed and no electronic information of any kind was affected.

These letters are dated May 13, 2016 and were sent on May 15, 2016. We were informed of the printing error on May 20, 2016 and immediately began looking in to the matter with the company that handled these mailings. We are also reviewing policies and procedures with them to prevent this error from occurring again. Although we do not anticipate any harm to patients and have no indication the information was misused, out of an abundance of caution, we have notified any customers who may have been affected.

While we do not take this lightly, it is important to note that the information that was disclosed is highly unlikely to lead to any fraudulent activity by those who received the letter.

The checks customers received are legitimate and correct. It is a refund they are entitled to receive and should feel assured to cash and utilize it. We will be following up with patients who do not cash their checks to help ensure that all refunds are effectively received. If customers would like to contact us to confirm or replace the check, they should call 1-866-788-5580.

We place great value in our customers’ trust and take this matter very seriously.  We are fully committed to protecting the privacy and security of our customers’ personal information.

 

Category: ExposureHealth DataPaperSubcontractorU.S.

Post navigation

← Update on Chicago employees’ retirement account breach
IE: Police officer cleared of leaking personal details used in virtual reality dispute →

2 thoughts on “Walmart vendor error exposed limited patient information”

  1. Harry Van Court says:
    June 17, 2016 at 10:26 am

    So was the error at the printing company or in the data files provided to the vendor? In such situations either is real possibility, but is very easy to blame an unnamed vendor. The company will not likely let us know, but knowing that the company is truly trying to identify the failure point would be great.

    I truly appreciate the information you provide on this site and I reference it (and your site) to folks in the security, audit, and privacy area here. Thank for the time an effort you make on this site.

    1. Dissent says:
      June 17, 2016 at 12:49 pm

      As you note, it could be either, but this one reads like it was the vendor’s error because they reviewed the vendor’s policies and procedures and not their own. 🙂

      And thank you so much for the kind words about this site.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported
  • Georgia hospital defeats data-tracking lawsuit
  • 60K BTC Wallets Tied to LockBit Ransomware Gang Leaked

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech
  • Florida bill requiring encryption backdoors for social media accounts has failed

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.