DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Laser & Dermatologic Surgery Center notifies 31,000 of possible PHI compromise

Posted on July 22, 2016 by Dissent

Laser & Dermatologic Surgery Center in Missouri notified HHS last month about an incident  affecting 31,000 patients, but the submission was not added to the breach tool until this month, and no details had been readily available online until now. I recently spoke with their practice manager, who provided me with a copy of their notice and some additional information.

Let’s start with their notice:

(June 12, 2016) – Laser & Dermatologic Surgery Center

(“LaserDerm”) today confirmed it fell victim to unauthorized access of its computer systems that may have led to the disclosure of certain patient information. With the assistance of IT professionals, the issue has been identified and resolved.

The data security incident was discovered on Monday, March 21, 2016. This incident involved the identification of an unauthorized user that, according to computer logs, had accessed the computer system several times beginning as early as March 1, 2016. During this unauthorized access, it is possible that patient names, addresses, dates of birth, and social security numbers may potentially have been exposed. Although there is no evidence at this time that electronic medical records were accessed, this possibility cannot be ruled out; therefore, we have notified all patients potentially affected by this incident, as well as, the appropriate government agencies. We have taken every step necessary to address the incident, and are committed to fully protecting all of the information our patients have entrusted to us.

Following discovery of the breach on March 21, 2016, the computer system was immediately disconnected and IT professionals were engaged to secure the system. Forensic analysis is ongoing in an attempt to identify the origin of the unauthorized access. Actions are also being defined and implemented at the clinic to prevent this type of breach from occurring again.

Although we are unaware of any misuse of any patient’s personal information, we are encouraging patients to remain vigilant by reviewing account statements and monitoring free credit reports.

For questions or additional information regarding this incident, please call 636-449-4550, leave a message and someone will return your call.

Of note, the breach was discovered after the practice had been sold to others. It was the new owners’ IT personnel who discovered the breach.  According to a spokesperson, they also discovered that malware had been injected into the system, but it was not clear whether it was part of the same incident or not. The previous owners had received a ransom notice with the ransomware, but they did not pay it, and were able to restore their system fully.


Related:

  • Two U.K. teenagers appear in court over Transport of London cyber attack
  • ModMed revealed they were victims of a cyberattack in July. Then some data showed up for sale.
  • Toys “R” Us Canada customers notified of breach of personal information
  • Confidence in ransomware recovery is high but actual success rates remain low
  • Kaufman County's data breach was their second one in three weeks
  • Hacking Formula 1: Accessing Max Verstappen's passport and PII through FIA bugs
Category: Breach IncidentsHackMalware

Post navigation

← Teenager who hacked governments worldwide is spared jail
Glassdoor email gaffe exposers users’ email addresses →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • District of Massachusetts Allows Higher-Ed Student Data Breach Claims to Survive
  • End of the game for cybercrime infrastructure: 1025 servers taken down
  • Doctor Alliance Data Breach: 353GB of Patient Files Allegedly Compromised, Ransom Demanded
  • St. Thomas Brushed Off Red Flags Before Dark-Web Data Dump Rocks Houston
  • A Wiltshire police breach posed possible safety concerns for violent crime victims as well as prison officers
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Almost two years later, Alpha Omega Winery notifies those affected by a data breach.
  • Court of Appeal reaffirms MFSA liability in data leak case, orders regulator to shoulder costs
  • A jailed hacking kingpin reveals all about the gang that left a trail of destruction
  • Army gynecologist took secret videos of patients during intimate exams, lawsuit says

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • As shoplifting surges, British retailers roll out ‘invasive’ facial recognition tools
  • Data broker Kochava agrees to change business practices to settle lawsuit
  • Amendment 13 is gamechanger on data security enforcement in Israel
  • Changes in the Rules for Disclosure for Substance Use Disorder Treatment Records: 42 CFR Part 2: What Changed, Why It Matters, and How It Aligns with HIPAAs
  • Always watching: How ICE’s plan to monitor social media 24/7 threatens privacy and civic participation

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net
Security Issue: security[at]databreaches.net
Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight
Signal: +1 516-776-7756
DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.