DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

UK businesses bullish about ransomware, but majority pay up when attacked

Posted on September 8, 2016 by Dissent

An interesting press release from Trend Micro suggests that more UK entities are paying ransom than we might hear about in the media. The survey was conducted in August:

London, September 7th, 2016 – The majority (74%) of UK organisations who haven’t experienced a ransomware attack remain bullish about the threat, claiming they would never pay up if infected. However, around two thirds (65%) of UK companies confronted with a ransomware situation do end up paying the ransom according to a new survey from cyber security firm Trend Micro. The survey also revealed only 45% of those infected got their data back upon paying the ransom, which means 1 in 5 companies paid up but never got back their data.

The research showed almost half (44%) of UK businesses have been infected by ransomware in the last 24 months. Almost a third (27%) of those more than once – with the most unlucky UK organisation targeted as much as five times. Those who have been targeted by ransomware say that a third (33%) of their employees were affected by the infection, along with an estimated 31% of the organisation’s customers.

The rapid development of ransomware has become a major security issue for UK businesses because of one thing: “it works,” said Bharat Mistry, cybersecurity consultant at Trend Micro. “When faced with a ransom situation, most organisations simply cannot afford to part with the encrypted data and are forced to fork out the requested amount, often more than once. Caving in to the demands of cyber-extortionists only reassure them of their strategy and perpetuates the threat cycle. That’s why companies must adequately protect themselves against ransomware and avoid playing by attacker’s terms.”

The survey shows that the average amount of ransom requested in the UK was £540, although 20% of companies reported ransoms of more than £1000. In the vast majority of cases (89%) there was a time limit on paying the ransom and more than half (57%) of companies reported having less than 24 hours to pay up, with a national mean of 19 hours. Organisations affected by ransomware estimate they spent 33 man hours on average fixing the issues caused by the ransomware infection.

When asked about motivations behind a decision to pay the ransom, most companies (37%) said they were worried about being fined if data was lost. Other reasons included encrypted data being highly confidential (32%) and low ransom amount (29%). Separately, the majority (66%) of companies that refused to pay up, said they don’t bargain with cybercriminals as a rule. A further 60% claimed they were able to recover the data from back up files, and over a quarter (26%) believed the data encrypted wasn’t valuable or confidential, and hence was not worth paying for.

When infected by ransomware, 81% of companies have contacted a law enforcement agency, who were able to assist in about half of the cases (51%).

“Ransomware has completely dominated the current threat landscape,” added Bharat Mistry. “During the first part of 2016, we blocked and detected almost 80 million ransomware threats and identified 79 new ransomware families – comparing to 29 in the whole of the 2015. That’s a 179% increase. Quite a few of those were built with routines that are designed to attack enterprise machine and endpoints. It’s time companies take heed.”

 

Category: Commentaries and AnalysesMalwareOf Note

Post navigation

← Hitsniffer ceases trading because of a malicious-insider data leak
Two members of “Crackas with Attitude” arrested in North Carolina →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Twilio denies breach following leak of alleged Steam 2FA codes
  • Personal information exposed by Australian Human Rights Commission data breach
  • International cybercrime tackled: Amsterdam police and FBI dismantle proxy service Anyproxy
  • Moldovan Police Arrest Suspect in €4.5M Ransomware Attack on Dutch Research Agency
  • N.W.T.’s medical record system under the microscope after 2 reported cases of snooping
  • Department of Justice says Berkeley Research Group data breach may have exposed information on diocesan sex abuse survivors
  • Masimo Manufacturing Facilities Hit by Cyberattack
  • Education giant Pearson hit by cyberattack exposing customer data
  • Star Health hacker claims sending bullets, threats to top executives: Reports
  • Nova Scotia Power hit by cyberattack, critical infrastructure targeted, no outages reported

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • License Plate Reader Company Flock Is Building a Massive People Lookup Tool, Leak Shows
  • FTC dismisses privacy concerns in Google breakup
  • ARC sells airline ticket records to ICE and others
  • Clothing Retailer, Todd Snyder, Inc., Settles CPPA Allegations Regarding California Consumer Privacy Act Violations
  • US Customs and Border Protection Plans to Photograph Everyone Exiting the US by Car
  • Google agrees to pay Texas $1.4 billion data privacy settlement
  • The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.