DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Adventures in breach notification, Saturday edition

Posted on September 17, 2016 by Dissent

Someone should start a web site archiving the inappropriate responses we get when we try to notify entities that they’ve had a data breach.  This would be my entry for today:

I tried to alert an entity that they’d been hacked and data had been exfiltrated. It was after normal business hours, and I could find only one extension that reached an actual person. I told them why I was calling, figuring that they would take the information and escalate the message internally.

I seem to have figured wrong.

The employee told me that their extension was for emergencies, and that unless  I had an emergency, theirs was the wrong extension. I replied that I understood that, but I was trying to alert the firm to *their* emergency.

Did they try to transfer my call? No, they did not.

Did they ask for information that might have helped them? No, they did not.

They hung up on me.

And no, I didn’t call back.

No related posts.

Category: Commentaries and Analyses

Post navigation

← Hacker attacks American Human Rights Council and 62 other websites calling for jihad
CalOptima notifies members of breach 8 months later? →

2 thoughts on “Adventures in breach notification, Saturday edition”

  1. Indee One says:
    September 17, 2016 at 2:56 pm

    It is a good thing you take rejection not personally… probably glad you are not in sales industry

    1. Dissent says:
      September 17, 2016 at 3:03 pm

      A firm I worked for a long time ago asked me to help out in sales. The customers asked me what I thought of the merchandise. I told them the truth. My sales experience lasted, oh, maybe an hour. 🙂

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • DOJ investigates ex-ransomware negotiator over extortion kickbacks
  • Hackers Using PDFs to Impersonate Microsoft, DocuSign, and More in Callback Phishing Campaigns
  • One in Five Law Firms Hit by Cyberattacks Over Past 12 Months
  • U.S. Sanctions Russian Bulletproof Hosting Provider for Supporting Cybercriminals Behind Ransomware
  • Senator Chides FBI for Weak Advice on Mobile Security
  • Cl0p cybercrime gang’s data exfiltration tool found vulnerable to RCE attacks
  • Kelly Benefits updates its 2024 data breach report: impacts 550,000 customers
  • Qantas customers involved in mammoth data breach
  • CMS Sending Letters to 103,000 Medicare beneficiaries whose info was involved in a Medicare.gov breach.
  • Esse Health provides update about April cyberattack and notifies 263,601 people (1)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Oregon Amends Its Comprehensive Privacy Statute
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Liberal Majority Strikes Down 176-Year-Old Abortion Ban
  • 20 States Sue HHS to Stop Medicaid Data Sharing with ICE
  • Kids are making deepfakes of each other, and laws aren’t keeping up
  • The Trump administration is building a national citizenship data system
  • Supreme Court Decision on Age Verification Tramples Free Speech and Undermines Privacy
  • New Jersey Issues Draft Privacy Regulations: The New

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.