DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

FTC v. LabMD: Brace for the Ripple Effect

Posted on October 3, 2016 by Dissent

Ricci Dipshan and C. Ryan Barber have an article on the importance and possible implications of LabMD’s challenge to the FTC’s application of their Section 5 authority when it comes to data security. Here’s a snippet:

The lack of tangible evidence in the case is hard to overstate. While LabMD, like the many other companies caught in FTC’s crosshairs, mishandled sensitive information, “nobody spoke up and said their medical information had been exposed. Nobody spoke up and said they were embarrassed by that or it violated their privacy—there was no evidence of medical identity theft,” says Julie O’Neill, a former FTC staff attorney who is currently of counsel at Morrison & Foerster’s privacy practice. The basis for the FTC’s action, she adds, is the belief that personal data “was exposed is an injury unto itself, even if nothing further comes of it.”

For many, the FTC’s legal argument can seem like a shot across the bow. By virtue of bringing an action against LabMD, the FTC is broadening its scope to regulate potential and intangible cybersecurity risk, regardless of material evidence of injury. And in doing so, the commission may be heading down a risky and far-reaching path.

[…]

And while a court ruling could uphold the FTC’s unfairness standard, it may also find it an entirely inadequate legal tool for cybersecurity enforcement. “The focus on creating an intangible harm that results from a data breach or lax cybersecurity seems to point out in some ways that Section 5 isn’t a good fit for cybersecurity, and maybe that wasn’t what Congress intended for the FTC to be doing when it adopted the statute,” says Scott Delacourt, partner at Wiley Rein and chair of the firm’s FTC practice.

Read their entire article on LegalTechNews.

Related posts:

  • Digging in their heels: Wyndham and LabMD challenge FTC’s authority in data security cases
  • FTC v. LabMD: A bad case and a questionable decision, but the right outcome
  • The FTC’s Data Security Error: Treating Small Businesses Like The Fortune 1000
  • LabMD Responds to FTC Complaint: Claims Agency Lacks Enforcement Jurisdiction
Category: Breach Incidents

Post navigation

← Leet.cc data hacked in February publicly dumped
Illegal pot dispensary customers fume over email privacy breach →

1 thought on “FTC v. LabMD: Brace for the Ripple Effect”

  1. Regret says:
    October 3, 2016 at 11:59 am

    Frustrating that government agencies like the FTC are so vigorous in expanding their powers in the absence of a clear legislative directive to do so. At a minimum, if they are going to pursue businesses for violating regulations, it would be nice if they wrote the regulations first.

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Texas Centers for Infectious Disease Associates Notifies Individuals of Data Breach in 2024
  • Battlefords Union Hospitals notifies patients of employee snooping in their records
  • Alert: Scattered Spider has added North American airline and transportation organizations to their target list
  • Northern Light Health patients affected by security incident at Compumedics; 10 healthcare entities affected
  • Privacy commissioner reviewing reported Ontario Health atHome data breach
  • CMS warns Medicare providers of fraud scheme
  • Ex-student charged with wave of cyber attacks on Sydney uni
  • Detaining Hackers Before the Crime? Tamil Nadu’s Supreme Court Approves Preventive Custody for Cyber Offenders
  • Potential Cyberattack Scrambles Columbia University Computer Systems

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Hacker helped kill FBI sources, witnesses in El Chapo case, according to watchdog report
  • Germany Wants Apple, Google to Remove DeepSeek From Their App Stores
  • Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring age verification on porn sites
  • Justices nix Medicaid ‘right’ to choose doctor, defunding Planned Parenthood in South Carolina
  • European Commission publishes its plan to enable more effective law enforcement access to data
  • Sacred Secrets: The Biblical Case for Privacy and Data Protection
  • Microsoft’s Departing Privacy Chief Calls for Regulator Outreach

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.