DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Neiman Marcus to settle long-running data breach litigation for $1.6m?

Posted on March 18, 2017 by Dissent

Law360 reports:

 Neiman Marcus has agreed to pay $1.6 million to resolve a data breach class action in Illinois federal court over a December 2013 cyber intrusion that revealed the credit card data of 350,000 shoppers of the luxury retailer, according to a court document filed Friday.

Read more on Law360 if you have a subscription. If you don’t have a subscription, don’t worry – I imagine other news outlets will also cover the settlement.

Past coverage of the breach and litigation on this site are linked from here. The case may best be remembered for the Seventh Circuit’s reversal of the district court’s dismissal of the lawsuit for lack of standing. Following that someone stunning reversal, the retailer failed to get the appeal reheard en banc, and then suffered a second loss back in district court when it also failed to get the case dismissed for failure to demonstrate negligence on their part.

I doubt most lawyers would have suggested that the retailer settle the suit when it was first filed, as most of these lawsuits that do not allege concrete injury actually did/do get dismissed for lack of standing. So Neiman Marcus chose not to settle at the outset, and….. I wonder how much this litigation has cost them by now? And what’s the value of the bad press of keeping their name in headlines associated with customer complaints?  With the benefit of hindsight, would they fight this all again?

 

Category: Business SectorMalwareU.S.

Post navigation

← Google Points to Another POS Vendor Breach – Krebs
Lane Community College notifies health clinic patients of potential breach →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Trump Rewrites Cybersecurity Policy in Executive Order
  • AMI Group – Travel & Tours notice of ransomware attack
  • Resource: Insider Threat reports
  • Za: Cyber extortionist sentenced to eight years in jail
  • ICE takes steps to deport the Australian hacker known as “DR32”
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • Nigerian National Sentenced To More Than Five Years For Hacking, Fraud, And Identity Theft Scheme
  • Data breach of patient info ends in firing of Miami hospital employee
  • Texas DOT investigates breach of crash report records, sends notification letters
  • PowerSchool hacker pleads guilty, released on personal recognizance bond

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Privacy Victory! Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in OPM/DOGE Lawsuit
  • The Decision That Murdered Privacy
  • Hearing on the Federal Government and AI
  • California county accused of using drones to spy on residents
  • How the FBI Sought a Warrant to Search Instagram of Columbia Student Protesters
  • Germany fines Vodafone $51 million for privacy, security breaches
  • Malaysia enacts data sharing rules for public sector

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.