DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

Singapore Personal Data Protection Commissioner fines ION Orchard

Posted on July 12, 2017 by Dissent

A financial penalty of $15,000 was imposed on Orchard Turn Developments for failing to make reasonable security arrangements to protect personal data of its members that was stored on its server. Orchard Turn Developments was also issued directions to patch all system vulnerabilities already identified, conduct a penetration test and rectify new weaknesses identified, as well as implement a password management policy and conduct training for staff on password management best practices.

From the decision:

In this case, the Complainant received two unauthorised emails, purportedly sent by the Organisation promoting “free” ION+ Reward points. Investigations discovered that an unknown perpetrator had gained unauthorised access to a server that held personal data of the Organisation’s members. The perpetrator then used an application on the compromised server to send the unauthorised emails to the Organisation’s members using their personal data that was held in the server. This data breach incident raised the question of whether the Organisation had met its Protection Obligation under the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (“PDPA”) to make reasonable security arrangements to sufficiently protect personal data held on the server.

Read more about the decision on the Commissioner’s site.

Category: Business SectorHackNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← How A Verizon Partner Exposed 14 Million Customer Accounts
No Jio data theft, says Navi Mumbai police after initial probe →

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Washington Post investigating cyberattack on journalists, WSJ reports
  • Resource: State Data Breach Notification Laws – June 2025
  • WestJet investigates cyberattack disrupting internal systems
  • Plastic surgeons often store nude photos of patients with their identity information. When would we call that “negligent?”
  • India: Servers of two city hospitals hacked; police register FIR
  • Ph: Coop Hospital confirms probe into reported cyberattack
  • Slapped wrists for Financial Conduct Authority staff who emailed work data home
  • School Districts Unaware BoardDocs Software Published Their Private Files
  • A guilty plea in the PowerSchool case still leaves unanswered questions
  • Brussels Parliament hit by cyber-attack

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Vermont signs Kids Code into law, faces legal challenges
  • Data Categories and Surveillance Pricing: Ferguson’s Nuanced Approach to Privacy Innovation
  • Anne Wojcicki Wins Bidding for 23andMe
  • Would you — or wouldn’t you?
  • New York passes a bill to prevent AI-fueled disasters
  • Synthetic Data and the Illusion of Privacy: Legal Risks of Using De-Identified AI Training Sets
  • States sue to block the sale of genetic data collected by DNA testing company 23andMe

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.