DataBreaches.Net

Menu
  • About
  • Breach Notification Laws
  • Privacy Policy
  • Transparency Report
Menu

More details emerge on NHS Lanarkshire ransomware attack

Posted on August 29, 2017 by Dissent

The cyber attack that led to operations and appointments being cancelled at NHS Lanarkshire was another “ransomware” case, Neil Pooran reports:

The malicious software has been identified as a programme called Bitpaymer, a new type of ransomware which was able to get past existing security measures.

Bitpaymer locks away files and demands payments in Bitcoins, an online currency, to unlock them.

It also threatens to release files if the payment is not received but NHS Lanarkshire said it had no reports this had happened.

Read more on STV News.


Related:

  • Au: Qantas hackers gave airline 72-hour deadline
  • Au: Junior doctor faces fresh toilet spying charges as probe widens to other major hospitals
  • BlackSuit ransomware site seized as part of Operation Checkmate
  • Russia suspected of hacking Dutch prosecution service systems
  • Korea imposes 343 million won penalty on HAESUNG DS for data breach of 70,000 shareholders
  • Paying cyberattackers is wrong, right? Should Taos County's incident be an exception? (1)
Category: Health DataMalwareNon-U.S.

Post navigation

← Tax documents with personal info found in East Naples dumpster
Personal info, Social Security numbers for lacrosse players posted on MLL website →

3 thoughts on “More details emerge on NHS Lanarkshire ransomware attack”

  1. eca says:
    August 29, 2017 at 3:17 pm

    Its funny..
    I wonder if this is a Ploy by Some of these companies to delete/Cover/get rid of OLD data and have a reason NOT to have tax documents/UPGRADE systems that need more Room, Hard drives, data storage….

    There is to much happening. And any GOOD server company/software creater should be ahead of the task..

    BEFORE this point i would have been slapping fingers with a 3′ ruler..

    1. Dissent says:
      August 29, 2017 at 3:28 pm

      This is the NHS we’re talking about. Study their history of data security and breaches. They are one of the reasons God gave us #SMH and #facepalm. But if the ransomware was a new variant, then, well….. except: how did it get into the system?

      1. ECA says:
        August 30, 2017 at 1:19 am

        tHATS IT..
        Basic protection and keeping the MAIL SERVER separate..
        Some how an Injection/INPUT of the program HAD to be done..
        USB, Floppy, Keyboard, and all that OR MAIL..

        And that Still comes back to BASIC security. EVEN from remote, from a Client reading DATA and adding DATA, there SHOULD have been SOME TYPE of protection..
        Even if it just VALIDATED that the DATA was DATA, not exe/bat/msi files..
        ANd if this is a LARGE format server…Lots of storage…IT WILL TAKE TIME to do the process.
        All of a sudden, ALL your HD start Running NUTS..??

        Thats the concern..Validating data is VERY BASIC and easy to do..
        Still want to know the OS these companies are running..

Comments are closed.

Now more than ever

"Stand with Ukraine:" above raised hands. The illustration is in blue and yellow, the colors of Ukraine's flag.

Search

Browse by Categories

Recent Posts

  • Hackers post stolen St. Paul data online as efforts to reset city employee passwords surge forward
  • Justice Department Announces Coordinated Disruption Actions Against BlackSuit (Royal) Ransomware Operations
  • NL: Hackers breach cancer screening data of almost 500,000 women
  • Violent Crypto Crimes Surge in 2025 Amid Massive Data Leaks
  • Why Ransomware Attacks Are Decreasing in 2025
  • KR: Yes24, the largest Internet bookstore in Korea, suffered its second ransomware attack in two months
  • Korea wins world’s top hacking contest for 4th consecutive year
  • 7-Zip Vulnerability Lets Hackers Write Files and Run Malicious Code
  • Connex Credit Union notifies 172,000 members of hacking incident
  • Federal judiciary says it is boosting security after cyberattack; researcher finds new leaks (CORRECTED)

No, You Can’t Buy a Post or an Interview

This site does not accept sponsored posts or link-back arrangements. Inquiries about either are ignored.

And despite what some trolls may try to claim: DataBreaches has never accepted even one dime to interview or report on anyone. Nor will DataBreaches ever pay anyone for data or to interview them.

Want to Get Our RSS Feed?

Grab it here:

https://databreaches.net/feed/

RSS Recent Posts on PogoWasRight.org

  • Navigating Privacy Gaps and New Legal Requirements for Companies Processing Genetic Data
  • Germany’s top court holds that police can only use spyware to investigate serious crimes
  • Flightradar24 receives reprimand for violating aircraft data privacy rights
  • Nebraska Attorney General Sues GM and OnStar Over Alleged Privacy Violations
  • Federal Court Allows Privacy Related Claims to Proceed in a Proposed Class Action Lawsuit Against Motorola
  • Italian Garante Adopts Statement on Health Data and AI
  • Trump administration is launching a new private health tracking system with Big Tech’s help

Have a News Tip?

Email: Tips[at]DataBreaches.net

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

Contact Me

Email: info[at]databreaches.net

Mastodon: Infosec.Exchange/@PogoWasRight

Signal: +1 516-776-7756

DMCA Concern: dmca[at]databreaches.net
© 2009 – 2025 DataBreaches.net and DataBreaches LLC. All rights reserved.